Superdelegates rarely change their mind before a candidate concedes, as far as I know. It's also pretty silly to try to demand that they bend to the will of the voters when the very purpose of their existence is so that their opinions have more weight - and also since Hillary still looks likely to actually win the nomination and popular vote, if the next few weeks go as projected, and especially if she wins both Nevada and South Carolina by the decent margins their most recent polls have suggested (the last gaps were 23 and 37 respectively, so even if they have narrowed she's likely to win).
It's not a good look to get too confident after NH with likely Hillary victories on the way both this month and on Super Tuesday. Even the media is getting into themselves too much over this - Politico is practically ******** out articles that ask "How much trouble is Hillary in?" or talk about her allies "grappling with a crushing loss." It's so tiring to have such overreactions so soon. She's still the frontrunner, she still has 394 total delegates to 44, she's only down 32 to 36 in pledged delegates even after his "massive" NH win, she's still polling like a mother****er in
literally every other state even if they need to be updated, and she's still on track. I hope everyone in the race - including Hillary herself - realizes that and doesn't overreact.
Quote:
Originally posted by BlueTimberwolf
It's not about the number of executive orders, it's about the content. Obama keeps overstepping his executive authority and bypassing congress, which is doing nothing but seeding ill-will and wasting resources as they get struck down by the courts.
|
I want to know on what grounds you'd suggest he's
overstepping his executive authority.
