[foxaylove]

at the salty Catholic priest in the crowd shaking his head at her mentioning how she wants to defend Planned Parenthood and Gay Marriage Rights.

[Skywalker]

love how the Democrat debates and town halls are so elegant and thoughtful compared to some others.

[feelslikeadream]

Originally posted by Javan

Really? Because the evidence is there. So really that's just her kinda insulting people's intelligence. I mean maybe not yours, but it does mean. Don't piss on our face and call it rain gurl. The receipts are there.

What kind of imaginary receipts exist that show how GS paying her speaking fees from '13-'15 have influenced her political decisions? She hasn't been in office. I think you misunderstood.

[D_Man3379]

Lmao did ya'll see that priest guy shaking his head

[TurntUp]

She ended really well

And it was great when she called out Bernie cause that's exactly why I don't side wi him. His promises are just so un achievable and unrealistic.

[Citrus]

Originally posted by Javan

Really? Because the evidence is there. So really that's just her kinda insulting people's intelligence. I mean maybe not yours, but it does mean. Don't piss on our face and call it rain gurl. The receipts are there.

I've asked this before, but I'll try again. What votes and/or actions are you referring to? Because you've never actually specified.

[hooky]

Originally posted by Butters

Has this been posted before?
http://nypost.com/2016/01/16/dont-be...ard-communist/

My head's still spinning

Originally posted by Retro

alkdshalsdfo

I was well aware of all of the actual information here but this article is almost mean

It's the NYP (a tabloid), it has no credibility

[rivers]

That was a decent town hall. HRC's people need to better train ha on those Wall St questions though

[Javan]

Originally posted by Retro

Then that's what I think. No, I don't think the way she answered today was the best way she's answered. I do, however, think she did more than well enough on the rest of the foreign policy things.

ok. But the point was if she did more than enough, she should have listed her alleged achievements as SOS to show that she's trustworthy on foreign policy, as opposed to saying "oh i was pressured into making a gamble in the past and it was unfortunately a loss, soz".

Originally posted by Retro

But answer this for me. What has she done FOR Wall Street? Speaking fees don't mean support.

Even you don't believe that. Take off the rose glasses.



In politics, money to candidates is influence. Like politics 101.

[Citrus]

Javan your reasoning on what Hillary has done for banks is legitimately awful

[Retro]

Originally posted by Javan

ok. But the point was if she did more than enough, she should have listed her alleged achievements as SOS to show that she's trustworthy on foreign policy, as opposed to saying "oh i was pressured into making a gamble in the past and it was unfortunately a loss, soz".


Even you don't believe that. Take off the rose glasses.



In politics, money to candidates is influence. Like politics 101.

In your first paragraph, you're essentially criticizing the way she answered, as even I did, while admitting you have full knowledge of the fact that she has better answers at her disposal and has good foreign policy experience.

As for the second part, no. If you can't establish correlation or causation with actions, words, or legislation, that is simply false and it is irresponsible to base your vote - or just part of it - simply on who gave her money to speak during a period in which she was neither in office nor campaigning - or even disclosing any decision to seek office.

[Mickey]

"What has Hillary done for Wall St.?"

"She took money from them"

[MAKSIM]

My bank acting shady as hell asking if my account was hacked after my Hillary donation

to be fair I also spent around around 120 on law school apps today and booked 5 nights at a Marriott in Russia

[Retro]

Originally posted by hooky

It's the NYP (a tabloid), it has no credibility

Obvi the article doesn't. Much of the history in it is fact, but they're clearly trying to spin it in an intensely negative and unfair way. That's why I gave it relatively little attention.

[Obsession]

If Hillary wins, I'm getting my hands on some Goldman-Sachs stock.

[Javan]

Originally posted by Citrus

I've asked this before, but I'll try again. What votes and/or actions are you referring to? Because you've never actually specified.

Originally posted by feelslikeadream

What kind of imaginary receipts exist that show how GS paying her speaking fees from '13-'15 have influenced her political decisions? She hasn't been in office. I think you misunderstood.

The fact the she's against reinstating Glass-Steagel when it is common knowledge that it led to the financial crisis of 08. But apparently she's here for "the people". Ok sis.

[hooky]

Originally posted by hooky

It's the NYP (a tabloid), it has no credibility

Also it's owned by News Corp, which formerly owned 21st Century Fox (which in turn owns Fox News and the Fox broadcasting network).

This doesn't really mean much (since the Fox network and its stations seem to lean more liberal and the shows aren't afraid of making fun of Republican figures), but they are also very anti-Hillary.

I mean the reach here

Former mayoral advisers from Burlington defend their old boss. They note that Sanders was never a member of the Communist Party and deny he was even a small-c communist, even while acknowledging he named their city softball squad the “People’s Republic of Burlington” and the town’s minor league baseball team the “Vermont Reds.”

The softball one was probably an inside joke, and for the second one THERE'S A MLB TEAM NAMED THE REDS Should we send them to Cuba?

[hooky]

News Corp also owns The Sun btw, that should explain a lot

[Cheetos]

Hillary really slayed. Foreign policy is really her thing.

[Citrus]

Originally posted by Javan

The fact the she's against reinstating Glass-Steagel when it is common knowledge that it led to the financial crisis of 08. But apparently she's here for "the people". Ok sis.

*In your opinion, because it certainly ain't widely-accepted fact.