Quote:
Originally posted by Retro
First of all, reread the sentence you bolded and come back with your first line. Second of all, you would definitely not know what the White House would be told or how the FBI would feel about it. Third, those "20+ really bad emails" are likely no different from the rest and the language surrounding them is a product of fearmongering and exaggeration. We do not personally know anything about the contents of about who generate the emails or information, and the Clinton campaign is actually publicly calling for those ones to be released. Finally, I don't believe I'm the delusional one for maintaining skepticism about this massive charade - the details of which, like the manpower behind it, we just would know no matter what "sources" come out to media - that has dragged on for an entire year without so much as a hint of actual legal action.
|
The FBI is going to the sources of the email cache, probably why it's taking so long, if the document came from the NSA they are going to them to verify it's classification. Remember the source of the info determines the classification and no one but the source agency can change classification. If markings were stripped off the documents that does not make her innocent because she is at a level where she should know what is or is not classified regardless of markings and the law backs that up. The whole, 'It wasn't marked when I received it," is a invalid argument.
James Comey went after David Petraeus and got him for a lot less. I know you are going to say he knew the documents were classified but again, ignorance is not an escape hatch for Hillary. She kept that info on a server that was not secured at her home and then at the hosting company in Denver where anyone with access to that server could read her emails.
I don't expect to convince anyone here because most are blinded to the fact and are just in the tank for Hillary but if this was a Republican in the same position they would be gone by now.