Quote:
Originally posted by Javan
Receipts for what?
Most of it is common knowledge.
You didn't know the DNC used to work for Hillary?
You didn't see the statements she made in this scandal? I don't really see why it was appropriate to go to the press. And she used very emotional language. Showing bias.
As for the DNC recommending the staffer:
https://www.yahoo.com/politics/the-s...200738611.html
And have you heard of a top to bottom investigation taking place for both campaigns? I'm pretty sure the proposal was rejected for whatever suspicious reason... |
That isn't what I meant about receipts but I actually didn't know some of this so thanks for that
Quote:
Originally posted by Javan
The conspiracy claims are valid tho. Head of the DNC used to work for Hillary. She wasn't impartial when dealing with the information scandal. The way in which she went to the press was very malicious.
Also the staffer that was at fault was recommended by the DNC. What are the odds 
And did that independent investigation that Bernie called for ever take place? The firewall went down a few times, how do we know Hillary didn't use that to her advantage. Conviniently for her we will never know.... |
When you said "also the staffer at fault was recommended by the DNC. What are the odds" I was asking for receipts proving the staffer especially did this act as sabatoge. You implied it so I wanted receipts. Just because he was recommended by them doesn't mean anything alone.
And again the independent investigation has nothing to do with he DNC if it's independent so you're blaming them for that (and incidentally) Clinton. Like where are the receipts to show they had something to do with the independent investigation not taking place?
Like I said until you can prove those things, those theories will be just that, theories. Nothing proven
