[Caesar]

Originally posted by Reinvention

You sure about that?

What else is there to do sweetie?

[FunkyDinevo]

Originally posted by jax.

!!!

people try too hard on this site.

well I don't think people are "" over the terrorist deaths, but the aftermath that it will cause; the revenge the terrorist will seek

[Rama]

Originally posted by Samuel

If it's true that it only hit ISIS buildings/killed their fighters, then good.

Not sure why everyone's ""ing over terrorist deaths.

Because it's almost impossible to believe only terrorists die after this air attacks.

So there's a high chance that those bombs killed innocent people.

[Qwerty1234]

Originally posted by Torturo

So solution is to let them terorrize whole world?

Yeah don't put (silly) words in my mouth. There is no solution. Bombing will contain them but it won't end terrorism.

[Timber]

What does ISIS think they're achieving by terrorizing the world? They're just killing themselves.

[jinzo]

Raqqa needs to be flattened to the ground. They've had it coming for so long.

[Doogle]

Praying not many innocent people were affected by this.

Truly scary but definitely the right decision to take at this point.

[OnMyCoolJ]

Originally posted by TheSoneNavy

The people in this thread. What are they suppose to do? Sit back and let ISIS kill more people?

so because they were attacked, they get to be judge, jury and execution?
This Isis mess has been going on for a while.. how did France discover overnight where the camp "allegedly" was? They couldn't have used these resources as a preventive method? The threat didn't arise with the attack. France dropping 20 bombs means that we in the neighbor countries are now all an even bigger open high risk target.

[Timber]

Originally posted by Qwerty1234

Yeah don't put (silly) words in my mouth. There is no solution. Bombing will contain them but it won't end terrorism.

[BoyOnBoy Wonder]

Originally posted by OhRly?

I guess you're right. Afterall it worked before in our History.

Yes. It did.

It ended the Nazi regime. It created a new nation in the United States. It ended slavery and from the US from falling apart.

Casualties are sad, yes; but war doesn't always have to be a bad thing.

[gagacasanova]

[Qwerty1234]

Originally posted by Reinvention

You sure about that?

Yes because irrational hate can't be fought any other way.

[ShouldersSideways]

Originally posted by FunkyDinevo

well I don't think people are "" over the terrorist deaths, but the aftermath that it will cause; the revenge the terrorist will seek

I see their point but this isn't about revenge for ISIS. They're planning to attack again anyway so might as well try to weaken them

[Sombra]

If it's just the IS, it's good. Hopefully it didn't do anything to innocent people.

[UnusualBoy]

This is not the way to solve things out, hope it does not lead into another WW.

[Qwerty1234]

Originally posted by Timber

And what did I say that was so bad?

[BoyOnBoy Wonder]

Originally posted by Qwerty1234

Yeah don't put (silly) words in my mouth. There is no solution. Bombing will contain them but it won't end terrorism.

Nothing will "end terrorism." You can't end an ideology.

But you CAN crush an organization which is what is currently happening, thank goodness.

[Brunette Ambition]

Originally posted by BoyOnBoy Wonder

And how exactly are you supposed to prevent them from growing and attacking even more?

God, pacifism isn't always the answer, people.

what in the actual hell

[Lyrical.]

Oh snap.

This is getting interesting.

[Sunshine.]