| |
Discussion: U.S. Election 2016: Primary Season
Member Since: 1/1/2014
Posts: 2,823
|
|
|
|
|
ATRL Senior Member
Member Since: 3/22/2012
Posts: 53,769
|
These goddamn emails what the ****
|
|
|
|
Banned
Member Since: 4/27/2012
Posts: 33,811
|
Jim Jordan's pretty hostile.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/3/2010
Posts: 71,871
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Shigo
This is the only time she will appear tho
|
No I don't mean testifying again. But the republicans will continue to use sound bites from this and the last to paint her as evil, unstrustworthy, etc during the general election. Instead of attacking her policies they will attack her directly her character. Sure they have no proof (yet, if they ever will) but this can wear down on the voters until they just get too skeptical over her
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/17/2013
Posts: 19,066
|
What the Republicans are hoping for is for her to slip up and give the FBI something to indict her with. Your average American may not catch an in-factual statement. The FBI will however if she makes one,
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/3/2010
Posts: 71,871
|
"What were the search terms"
Why do they care?!
|
|
|
|
Banned
Member Since: 4/27/2012
Posts: 33,811
|
Quote:
Originally posted by BlueTimberwolf
What the Republicans are hoping for is for her to slip up and give the FBI something to indict her with. Your average American may not catch an in-factual statement. The FBI will however if she makes one,
|
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/1/2014
Posts: 3,240
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Chanel.
And the media is leaning in favor of Hillary, so it's really not as if most people will see much other than that.
|
Yeah, but to say that they gave Hillary nine hours of "acting presidential" (paraphrasing) is a little ludicrous. At most, the "GP" will go "cool" and move on to whatever issues they care about.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/31/2012
Posts: 13,110
|
Quote:
Originally posted by RihsusChrist(ATG)
They'd have been better served to let the GOP presidential candidates define her on Benghazi/Emails...that of been more effective because they have direct access with the voters. But they can't do that because Trump is attacking all the other GOP candidates and tearing them down.
|
but who? who would actually do a good job skewering Hillary? It's been tested before. When Rick Lazio approached her on a debate stage and got too aggressive, it got Hillary female voters. When Obama called her "likable enough," and the media started beating her up after Iowa, she pulled off a surprise victory in New Hampshire. The only one who might be able to go after Hillary aggressively would be Carly FIorina, but even then, Carly talks like a frigid b**** and would probably turn off more people than she convinces.
|
|
|
|
ATRL Senior Member
Member Since: 3/22/2012
Posts: 53,769
|
Quote:
Originally posted by BlueTimberwolf
What the Republicans are hoping for is for her to slip up and give the FBI something to indict her with. Your average American may not catch an in-factual statement. The FBI will however if she makes one,
|
This isn't for the FBI, and the FBI investigation has little to nothing to do with this aside from the fact that both are related to emails.
There's actually no official statement that the FBI investigation focuses on her or is a criminal probe, I'll note.
They won't indict her for anything in this stupid hearing. If she were indicted, it would focus solely on the potential problems with the transmission of classified information, and that's only going to be if she's personally culpable for that.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/3/2010
Posts: 71,871
|
Mr. Roskam is getting angry 
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/7/2015
Posts: 10,527
|
Jim Jordan seems like the type of man that would scream at his five year old in public for losing a little league game.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/31/2012
Posts: 13,110
|
Jim Jordan doesn't realize that the louder he screams and more aggressive he seems, Hillary's calm cool answers just make him look like an a******
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/17/2013
Posts: 19,066
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Chanel.
This isn't for the FBI, and the FBI investigation has little to nothing to do with this aside from the fact that both are related to emails.
There's actually no official statement that the FBI investigation focuses on her or is a criminal probe, I'll note.
They won't indict her for anything in this stupid hearing. If she were indicted, it would focus solely on the potential problems with the transmission of classified information, and that's only going to be if she's personally culpable for that.
|
Lol, they are about to spend the next hour going over the server. If you don't they are watching this, you're naive.
Edit: And to say the FBI investigation has nothing do with this is ridiculous, if they find deleted Benghazi emails on her server it's over for her.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/31/2012
Posts: 13,110
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Chanel.
This isn't for the FBI, and the FBI investigation has little to nothing to do with this aside from the fact that both are related to emails.
There's actually no official statement that the FBI investigation focuses on her or is a criminal probe, I'll note.
They won't indict her for anything in this stupid hearing. If she were indicted, it would focus solely on the potential problems with the transmission of classified information, and that's only going to be if she's personally culpable for that.
|
he's right. there's a reason Hillary is dancing around a little bit. And if you look to her right, the man with brown hair and gray sideburns is her lawyer, who's been with her since Whitewater, and if you notice his nodding, you can tell that they've gone through these questions and answers before to make sure it's as specific without being specific as possible.
|
|
|
|
ATRL Senior Member
Member Since: 3/22/2012
Posts: 53,769
|
Quote:
Originally posted by BlueTimberwolf
Lol, they are about to spend the next hour going over the server. If you don't they are watching this, you're naive.
Edit: And to say the FBI investigation has nothing do with this is ridiculous, if they find deleted Benghazi emails on her server it's over for her.
|
No, it's not, especially if it's information that wasn't classified!
It's a FACT that the investigation is not centered on indicting her and is not yet designated as a criminal probe!
They might be watching but what is said here has almost nothing to do with their investigation!
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/17/2013
Posts: 19,066
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Chanel.
No, it's not, especially if it's information that wasn't classified!
It's a FACT that the investigation is not centered on indicting her and is not yet designated as a criminal probe!
They might be watching but what is said here has almost nothing to do with their investigation!
|
They already found like 400 classified emails on her server, and we have three more months of email releases.
The investigation doesn't have to be about indicting her, it can still lead to an indictment. Things don't happen in a vaccuum.
|
|
|
|
ATRL Senior Member
Member Since: 3/22/2012
Posts: 53,769
|
Quote:
Originally posted by TikiMiss
he's right. there's a reason Hillary is dancing around a little bit. And if you look to her right, the man with brown hair and gray sideburns is her lawyer, who's been with her since Whitewater, and if you notice his nodding, you can tell that they've gone through these questions and answers before to make sure it's as specific without being specific as possible.
|
All of that is true, but so is what I said. 
|
|
|
|
ATRL Senior Member
Member Since: 3/22/2012
Posts: 53,769
|
Quote:
Originally posted by BlueTimberwolf
They already found like 400 classified emails on her server, and we have three more months of email releases.
The investigation doesn't have to be about indicting her, it can still lead to an indictment. Things don't happen in a vaccuum.
|
400 that are classified now, let's be clear about that.
If they weren't at the time she sent or received them, they don't matter. Furthermore, if she was not the person responsible for moving classified information outside the government initially, it also does not matter.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/3/2010
Posts: 71,871
|
Mr. Westmoreland: Lemme tell you what I think
He's trash 
|
|
|
|
|
|
