MOTS - 5K
AGLM - 40K (2xPlatinum)
GGGB - 95K (3xPlatinum - but undercertified)
RR - 30K (Platinum - but undercertified)
Loud - 120K (5xPlatinum - but undercertified)
TTT - 60K (3xPlatinum - but undercertified)
UA - 50K (2xPlatinum - but undercertified)
= 400K
NORWAY (*She has no certifications here... but her albums perform AMAZINGLY. I wonder why she never got the money to pay for them certs):
MOTS - 1K
AGLM - 5K
GGGB - 100K (Should be 3xPlatinum at least)
RR - 75K (Should be 2xPlatinum at least. She went #1 and spent A LOT of weeks real high)
Loud - 100k (Should be 3xPlatinum at least)
TTT - 60K (Should be 2xPlatinum at least
UA - 50K (Should be Platinum at least. Almost 2xPlatinum)
Never got the fuss about first week sales, it doesn't make you a bigger artist if you have 500k first week and then end up having barely 2M WW when it's all said and done.
Even tho if she released this year she would have been #1 for weeks, maybe even months because sales are tragic these days, I mean you need to sell 90K to be #1
But when she said "my next step is to finish it111!!!!" we did not knew that this step will happen in 2016 (after her weed praising B-Day vacay in February OBVIOUSLY)
Never got the fuss about first week sales, it doesn't make you a bigger artist if you have 500k first week and then end up having barely 2M WW when it's all said and done.
Even tho if she released this year she would have been #1 for weeks, maybe even months because sales are tragic these days, I mean you need to sell 90K to be #1
I'm all here for longevity, but first week numbers show that people cares about your album and wants to support you.