[Green]

No Beatles for the 60's? So random

Take this with a grain of salt

[Almighty Gaga]

No lie
Thank for spilling the tea RS. More evidence of her legendary status

[Bounce]

Yikes @ the report.

The fumes already.

[ElleDriver]

That's weird. She has 0 artistic credibility or influence.

[Kid A]

She really fits in well with the rest of the legends there

[enxe]

Oops.

[z10]

uhhhhhhhh why is this reported? google rolling stone coverwall and look for urself

[Sandcastle]

It's true

[valyrianpopstar]

Originally posted by ElleDriver

That's weird. She has 0 artistic credibility or influence.

she had enough influence to make lana write an entire song about her

[jackieshann]

We'll see after this next album. Strange how Madonna is representing the 80's when it should be MJ.

[Nemo]

Originally posted by Bad Kid.

uhhhhhhhh why is this reported? google rolling stone coverwall and look for urself

Link the source in the OP.

[Mariano]

Originally posted by EdgeOfAddiction

And No MJ? lol How accurate.

MJ should replace Madonna, other than that if you don't believe Gaga is the defining artist of the 10s, who it is ?

Edit: Not trying to say Madonna didn't have impact, MJ would be the only one able to replace her. In fact they should have both been listed for the 80s.

[XStaticProcess]

Mariah should be there instead of Kurt imo
Madonna over MJ.Right choice
Congrats to Gaga

[Komet blu]

We already knew that she's The Legend of Our Generation, but another day another slay.

[Sonny]

Originally posted by ElleDriver

That's weird. She has 0 artistic credibility or influence.

[z10]

select any decade then the year at the top (whatever year you end up on) and gaga is the photo girl for the 10s decade http://www.rollingstone.com/coverwall/1989

[Tristan]

[6 Apple St]

Go Gaga

[Rami328]

Another day, another slay for the Queen of Pop/Jazz/Television

[Nutitle]

Get that praise queen