"Republican presidential frontrunner Donald Trump has a new campaign-oriented book on how to restore a “crippled” America to greatness coming Oct. 27, Simon & Schuster imprint Threshold announced."
"Republican presidential frontrunner Donald Trump has a new campaign-oriented book on how to restore a “crippled” America to greatness coming Oct. 27, Simon & Schuster imprint Threshold announced."
His less than 1% supporters? Okay lets give him 2% just for the hell of it, that really worries you?
Nnn true. But also Walker had a lot of donors that will probably go to Rubio or Cruz. It's fun to think about how many millions of dollars of billionaire donor money Walker wasted by running
"Republican presidential frontrunner Donald Trump has a new campaign-oriented book on how to restore a “crippled” America to greatness coming Oct. 27, Simon & Schuster imprint Threshold announced."
Ben Carson is right about sharia law and the US constitution being mutually exclusive
Exactly. I don't understand this need to be accepting of all religions no matter what and expected to advocate for it. I wouldn't vote for a Satanist. If there are Muslims who aren't fundamentalists and want to be President fine, but Islam as religion is not compatible. It explicitly says Sharia rules above all. Do you want a Sharia subscriber appointing a Supreme Court justice? People have a right to not vote based on religion. Islam is not a race, it is a set of beliefs.
Exactly. I don't understand this need to be accepting of all religions no matter what and expected to advocate for it. I wouldn't vote for a Satanist. If there are Muslims who aren't fundamentalists and want to be President fine, but Islam as religion is not compatible. It explicitly says Sharia rules above all. Do you want a Sharia subscriber appointing a Supreme Court justice? People have a right to not vote based on religion. Islam is not a race, it is a set of beliefs.
It's not any more compatible than Christianity is TBQH. Muslims and Christians hold basically the same views on the issues. It's two sides of the same coin. its still belief not based on anything.
It's not any more compatible than Christianity is TBQH. Muslims and Christians hold basically the same views on the issues. It's two sides of the same coin. its still belief not based on anything.
No they don't. There are lots of differences. The constitution was founded on Christian principles even with the church and state distinction.
Exactly. I don't understand this need to be accepting of all religions no matter what and expected to advocate for it. I wouldn't vote for a Satanist. If there are Muslims who aren't fundamentalists and want to be President fine, but Islam as religion is not compatible. It explicitly says Sharia rules above all. Do you want a Sharia subscriber appointing a Supreme Court justice? People have a right to not vote based on religion. Islam is not a race, it is a set of beliefs.
The Church of Satan's beliefs are way closer to the Constitution's liberty and justice for all than the Bible is though.
It's not any more compatible than Christianity is TBQH. Muslims and Christians hold basically the same views on the issues. It's two sides of the same coin. its still belief not based on anything.
Name one Muslim led country that has the same freedoms as we do? What Ben was saying was if a Muslim isn't willing to uphold the constitution over his beliefs he won't vote for him, it's that simple.
I am not even a big Carson fan and I can see this as a dog-whistle for the left now.
Would you vote for someone who isn't going to uphold the constitution, it's a trick question, if you already voted for Obama.
]It's not any more compatible than Christianity is TBQH. Muslims and Christians hold basically the same views on the issues.[/b] It's two sides of the same coin. its still belief not based on anything.
LMAO no they don't. Christianity is about as hands-off as it gets for a religion. Also the most tolerant.
That aside, the GOP has sidelined so many minorities, YIKES (first the hispanics, now it's muslims). They are going to lose the forthcoming election so dramatically it's not even funny.
LMAO no they don't. Christianity is about as hands-off as it gets for a religion. Also the most tolerant.
That aside, the GOP has sidelined so many minorities, YIKES (first the hispanics, now it's muslims). They are going to lose the forthcoming election so dramatically it's not even funny.
No offense but how's a rich white woman gonna draw in Muslims, Hispanics, the poor, gays, or any other group that generally feels like the Republicans don't have their best interests at heart? I doubt she could even pull a majority of women, since Palin didn't help the McCain campaign.
No offense but how's a rich white woman gonna draw in Muslims, Hispanics, the poor, gays, or any other group that generally feels like the Republicans don't have their best interests at heart? I doubt she could even pull a majority of women, since Palin didn't help the McCain campaign.
I thought you were talking about Hillary until you said Republicans. You think Hillary has anyone other than her own interest at heart? Don't fool yourself.
Carly Fiorina still remembered in the Tech Industry as one of the worst CEOs of all time! LMAO.
How do people think she can run a Country when she she couldn't even run HP successfully? Also why do people think she has any shot of winning a Presidential election when she couldn't even win a Senatorial election? She claims that not having any experience of Public Service makes her more appealing to the electorate because the professional political class have failed. Let's not forget that she is only outside the professional political class herself because she lost her only previous election. Not sure how losing an election makes her any more reliable a candidate than those who have actually previously won elections in public office.
When Fiorina worked for McCain's Presidential Campaign, she said that Palin (and McCain) did not have the experience to run a major corporation like HP, because running a corporation is a different set of things. Now she is claiming that running HP gives her the experience to run the US as President, even though she previously claimed that they were different skillsets? LMAO
Watching the GOP Debate is both a tragedy and a comedy. I remember when they had clowns like Sarah Palin and W Bush, so scraping the barrel for candidates palatable to the fragmented ideologies of the modern GOP is hardly a new phenomena.
I love how Trump seems to hate immigrants to the USA. Of course his mother is an immigrant, as was his Grandfather. Two of his wives are immigrants. A walking contradiction.
Also I think it is hilarious seeing all these multi-millionaires competing to be viewed as the most pious of Christians. Have they forgotten that (according to the Gospels) Jesus literally said 'it is easier for a camel to pass through an eye of a needle than for a rich man to get into the Kingdom of Heavan.' As Jesus said, none of these rich candidates are going to heaven. Sorry, Jeb.
All these GOP Candidates want to axe Obamacare. Are they claiming that Jesus was opposed to Universal Healthcare and would only heal the sick with insurance coverage? I just find it amusing that they clearly ignore Jesus' examples of behaviour while pretending to be the most devout of Christians.
Carly Fiorina still remembered in the Tech Industry as one of the worst CEOs of all time! LMAO.
How do people think she can run a Country when she she couldn't even run HP successfully? Also why do people think she has any shot of winning a Presidential election when she couldn't even win a Senatorial election? She claims that not having any experience of Public Service makes her more appealing to the electorate because the professional political class have failed. Let's not forget that she is only outside the professional political class herself because she lost her only previous election. Not sure how losing an election makes her any more reliable a candidate than those who have actually previously won elections in public office.
When Fiorina worked for McCain's Presidential Campaign, she said that Palin (and McCain) did not have the experience to run a major corporation like HP, because running a corporation is a different set of things. Now she is claiming that running HP gives her the experience to run the US as President, even though she previously claimed that they were different skillsets? LMAO
Watching the GOP Debate is both a tragedy and a comedy. I remember when they had clowns like Sarah Palin and W Bush, so scraping the barrel for candidates palatable to the fragmented ideologies of the modern GOP is hardly a new phenomena.
I love how Trump seems to hate immigrants to the USA. Of course his mother is an immigrant, as was his Grandfather. Two of his wives are immigrants. A walking contradiction.
Also I think it is hilarious seeing all these multi-millionaires competing to be viewed as the most pious of Christians. Have they forgotten that (according to the Gospels) Jesus literally said 'it is easier for a camel to pass through an eye of a needle than for a rich man to get into the Kingdom of Heavan.' As Jesus said, none of these rich candidates are going to heaven. Sorry, Jeb.
All these GOP Candidates want to axe Obamacare. Are they claiming that Jesus was opposed to Universal Healthcare and would only heal the sick with insurance coverage? I just find it amusing that they clearly ignore Jesus' examples of behaviour while pretending to be the most devout of Christians.
Ahh, US Politics is so divisive and entertaining.
Of course the men were/are going to do anything to undermine Carly's accomplishments at HP...she was the first female CEO of a fortune 500 company. Breaking that glass ceiling sometimes isn't easy...Carly actually did that unlike Hillary, who rides on her husbands accomplishments.
Carly did run against a very liberal senator in liberal leaning California. She actually was competitive against Sen Boxer. Carly's message will play better with the more "centrist" American voting public.
McCain and Palin probably couldn't run a corporation...where is the lie? Carly's CEO experience would make her a better at delegating to her cabinet members, and finding the best people to do certain jobs.
Some candidates want to "restructure" not axe Obamacare.
Quote:
Originally posted by Chucko
I thought you were talking about Hillary until you said Republicans. You think Hillary has anyone other than her own interest at heart? Don't fool yourself.
