[EthaneFenty]

For the most part but she's doing well worldwide but without the U.S./NA She'd be unlike without other countries/continents

[Andie]

No.
Let's not say global but definitely multinational at this point.

[Rainsford]

Originally posted by 4Real

She's definitely NOT a nobody in here... pff

Ninguém se importa com ela aqui. Ela é mais conhecida que a Ariana Grande, I can give you that

[Rainsford]

Originally posted by heckinglovato

Wasn't Michael Jackson's biggest market the US? He seemed pretty global to me



But Demi's massive in Brazil and she's not half as global as Taylor
Like, guys... being global doesn't mean you have to smash in every single country.

What Demi has to do with Taylor Swift?

Both local.

[heckinglovato]

Also, I actually have no idea how she'd be #1 here for over a year if she wasn't global, like http://kworb.net/itunes/

Originally posted by ianBK4

What Demi has to do with Taylor Swift?

Both local.

You used the "Taylor isn't big in Brazil" card to elaborate on how she's not global, so I showed you that you can be massive in Brazil and still be pretty local.

[Stark]

Originally posted by EthaneFenty

For the most part but she's doing well worldwide but without the U.S./NA She'd be unlike without other countries/continents

Without US sales, 1989 would be at +3M which is more than most pop girls' last albums (without US sales).

[revel8]

She has sold 8 million albums in less than a year. Most artists will never sell that amount in their careers. Sold out Stadiums in 3 continents. That'll do.

[beautiful player]

Yes she is sorry

[Idontcareaboutyou]

She's not local anymore but not fully global either.

[GambleBreauxNews]

She's not local. Some stans of certain fanbases claiming she is when their fave would never do anything close to 1989's sales.

[Rainsford]

Originally posted by heckinglovato

Also, I actually have no idea how she'd be #1 here for over a year if she wasn't global, like http://kworb.net/itunes/



You used the "Taylor isn't big in Brazil" card to elaborate on how she's not global, so I showed you that you can be massive in Brazil and still be pretty local.

Taylor Swift is NOT global.
Demi Lovato is NOT global.

[Dollas n Diamonds]

Originally posted by heckinglovato

Also, I actually have no idea how she'd be #1 here for over a year if she wasn't global, like http://kworb.net/itunes/



You used the "Taylor isn't big in Brazil" card to elaborate on how she's not global, so I showed you that you can be massive in Brazil and still be pretty local.

wow this is such a shock Ian has been lying to us this entire time. how shamless

[Rayaine]

Originally posted by Idontcareaboutyou

She's not local anymore but not fully global either.

lol whats this supposed to mean??

[its_britney_bitch]

What exactly is y'all's definition of "global"? Cause Taylor is in no way, shape or form local in my opinion

[Goaty]

Since the working definition of "global" around here is presence in mainland Europe, probably not.

But who cares. You could remove her sales outside of the U.S. and she'd still be outselling the other girls 2:1.

[MileyRayChrist]

yes, nobody cares about ha in europe

[alimonster]

Originally posted by ianBK4

What Demi has to do with Taylor Swift?

Both local.

you tried to shade Taylor using your country but Demi's album is Diamond there but she's definitely not more global than Taylor Swift.

[alimonster]

Originally posted by ianBK4

Taylor Swift is NOT global.
Demi Lovato is NOT global.

I see you backtracking with your posts, kii luv it.

[Goaty]

Some "global" girls have released singles this year but no album title or release date is in sight.

Sounds to me like "local" = better, but to each his own!

[EthaneFenty]

Originally posted by dwuw

Without US sales, 1989 would be at +3M which is more than most pop girls' last albums (without US sales).

My point was U.S. Is her biggest market and that she would be a lot better off with only U.S. Sales than without U.S. Sales and having everywhere else