We are talking about how ugly he is not his music. Being unable to read what people are writing is a very hive thing to do.
Quote:
Originally posted by Last Boy on Earth
Ed Sheeran? a 6/10? even if he became skinny and had actual human proportions he wouldn't go past 2.5/10, he's a 0/10 atm, truly one of the vilest person I've seen, especially after the poop story, he could release the best song of all time and I still couldn't bare myself to enjoy it
Ed is a vile, disgusting looking gremlin whose Adele-level propaganda, in making the GP believe that his music is "real music", is
Wow agrihed
And if anything his ugliness makes him more marketable because people think he must have had to work so much harder/be so much more talented to have made it in the industry. And the people who support him get to feel superior to everyone else for not just caring about looks.
And if anything his ugliness makes him more marketable because people think he must have had to work so much harder/be so much more talented to have made it in the industry.
Yes. Knowing he recorded some love song while he had soiled his pants is a turn off on all fronts. Nevertheless you defended his looks which was the main topic of discussion in the first place
Yes. Knowing he recorded some love song while he had soiled his pants is a turn off on all fronts. Nevertheless you defended his looks which was the main topic of discussion in the first place
He's clearly not super hot but he's cute millions of fans agree with me even if ATRL doesn't
a very Army thing to do
even if he became skinny and had actual human proportions he wouldn't go past 2.5/10, he's a 0/10 atm, truly one of the vilest person I've seen, especially after the poop story, he could release the best song of all time and I still couldn't bare myself to enjoy it 
millions of fans agree with me even if ATRL doesn't
