Drag it sis. One performed the superbowl and impressed millions while the other had the flop of Glitter proportions and is only thought of by suicidal, pathetic gays.
Sis who wouldn't be angry when there is still a group of braindead suicidal monsters who still believe that they can compare their flop fav to legends.
It's like the block chihuahua who barks at the bigger and better dogs because it is small, insecure and stupid.... and suicidal.
and i noticed you were unable to refute any of my claims, proving them correct.
So why do Monsters keep coming for other stars who have longevity, impact and legend status?
It's really embarrassing everytime I see one of the poor monsters try to shade someone with 30+ years of being a cultural icon when their fave couldn't even survive half a decade. And Katy was picked over forGagaten at the superbowl because she's a likeable star, not some pretentious mess who only touches suicidal kids.
Sorry monsters, but as soon as she came your fave is now gagone! Noone really was that impressed by her and like a used condom the GP threw her in the trash. Madonna and Katy stay winning and performing at the superbowl, being relevant for more than 4 years, etc.
Omg I never realized Hunter Hayes became such a huge flop
Just a few years ago he had a 4x Plat single and a Platinum album
Yup.
I don't know why people act like country music fans have some type of undying loyalty just because there are legends like Tim McGraw still churning out hits and selling millions of albums.
You got to make music people want regardless of genre. Poor Britney.
EVERYONE is good with Taylor. She's open to anyone on her stage and means it. Except Kum Perry (who has no Grammy).
Welcome sis
Should've done this for the BTWBall instead of that plastic castle thing.
