Pointless — 1 point, expires in 30 days
There's no point to your post, or you're only using an unrelated image/GIF as your reply.
Can this apply to responding to someone's post with their avi/someone else's avi in the thread as a reaction gif/pic? Because I know this is extremely common and I've never seen anybody warned for this unless the person's avi was a real life photo?
Can this apply to responding to someone's post with their avi/someone else's avi in the thread as a reaction gif/pic? Because I know this is extremely common and I've never seen anybody warned for this unless the person's avi was a real life photo?
People get warned for flamebait if they use an avatar as a response in a shady way if that's what ur asking.
People get warned for flamebait if they use an avatar as a response in a shady way if that's what ur asking.
Example
MESS @ the examples.
But as far as using someone's avi in a non-shady way without any text with it, even if it has nothing to do with the OP or a post you're replying to. Can that be considered "pointless" and be warned?
But as far as using someone's avi in a non-shady way, even if it has nothing to do with the OP or a post you're replying to. Can that be considered "pointless" and be warned?
The rules set out that this isn't allowed (falls under pointless) but mods seem to be pretty lenient about it. That doesn't mean you're always exempt from receiving warning points though.
Can this apply to responding to someone's post with their avi/someone else's avi in the thread as a reaction gif/pic? Because I know this is extremely common and I've never seen anybody warned for this unless the person's avi was a real life photo?
There's not such thing as "Pointless" WP cathegory.
Can this apply to responding to someone's post with their avi/someone else's avi in the thread as a reaction gif/pic? Because I know this is extremely common and I've never seen anybody warned for this unless the person's avi was a real life photo?
Why do you think it should be warnable if it's harmless, non-flamebait, and just in a reacting way like a regular photo n?
Why do you think it should be warnable if it's harmless, non-flamebait, and just in a reacting way like a regular photo n?
D, no. It's just that a few pages ago I saw someone post that said "pointless" posts get 1 WP. But then someone ^ just said that doesn't exist anymore.
