Quote:
Originally posted by Luke.
The rolling stone copyright thing makes most sense so..  |
U cant even see her face in the cover u have to really zoom in...noone pays attention t a cover u cant even see something....how it makes sence rolling stone t spend their time suing an animated cover over britneys face..so britney cant pose with the same expression ever again? They will sue her? If they copyrighted the whole image of thw cover would be diffrent..but copyright the FACE? Doesnt even make sense honey
