[D.M.F]

Of course. The year Taylor owned she was bigger, her #1 singles are bigger on the biggest chart in the world, she's got more Grammy Awards (1 being in the top 4 category), bigger tours, bigger star power, etc, etc, etc.

[Jackson]

[slobro]

Originally posted by Eternium

The roof was the same in 1999 as it was in 2012 (see: 21). The difference is Britney actually got close to the roof whereas Taylor's peak never even got halfway there.

Btw, why are you withholding SEAs?

Except that same roof is now 3x (or more) harder to reach

And the roof pre-digital era was Thriller.. 21 for the digital era.

[Toxicity.]

Originally posted by Eternium

Taylor peaked with Fearless. It sold more WW than 1989, "Love Story" sold more in the U.S. than "Shake It Off" sold WW, "You Belong With Me" sold more in the U.S. than "Blank Space" has done WW, etc.

Taylor's peak was less than half as big as Britney's. Poor you

Complete lies to make your post seem credible when we all know they're fabrications you come up with in your deluded little head



and 1989 will outsell Fearless. The Lord never peaks. Especially not with her first/second album! How embarrassing is that who wants to have a frontloaded career that no one remembers

[Brinny Baby]

Originally posted by Waffles O'Brien

Probably yeah.

Brits success during her time was not that much bigger than many of her peers. Meanwhile Taylor is demolishing her competition.

Dido, Christina Aguilera, Destiny's Child, TLC, Jennifer Lopez etc. all sold like 10 million less than Britney for two eras (her first two). 1989 is her first era where she's selling above any other girl, but during Red there was P!nk, during Speak Now there was Katy, Rihanna and Gaga and during Fearless there was Gaga and Beyonce.

There's also more to an era than album sales, especially in the digital age.

Originally posted by Toxicity.

and 1989 will outsell Fearless. The Lord never peaks. Especially not with her first/second album! How embarrassing is that who wants to have a frontloaded career that no one remembers

Britney's teen pop days are remembered. You actually think people forgot that Britney used to be a teen popstar

[abrahamjmr]

These Swiftes whom said yes.

[Eternium]

Originally posted by Toxicity.

Complete lies to make your post seem credible when we all know they're fabrications you come up with in your deluded little head



and 1989 will outsell Fearless. The Lord never peaks. Especially not with her first/second album! How embarrassing is that who wants to have a frontloaded career that no one remembers

"Love Story" has sold 5.7M in the U.S. SIO has sold 5.2M WW.

"You Belong With Me" has sold over 4M in the U.S. BS has done 3.5M WW.

Taylor peaked with her second album and that peak wasn't even half as big as Britney's. Then again, I can't expect you to be knowledgeable when you don't even know Taylor's stats.

Originally posted by slobro

Except that same roof is now 3x (or more) harder to reach

And the roof pre-digital era was Thriller.. 21 for the digital era.

The 80s has a different roof thanks to the introduction of new media types like cassettes, CDs, etc. It's part of why the 90s look so big thanks to the creation of CDs and the rush to replace cassettes which made catalogue sales bigger than ever.

If Taylor's peak is as big as Britney's then she should have no problem approaching that roof.

Originally posted by KareBear

Exactly. Taylor almost broke Britneys record in 2014! Britney ain't sh*t

Except she couldn't with an extra day, digital music, more retailers, Starbucks, Papa John's, discounts, a considerably lower average price, the end of daylight savings time adding another extra hour to her extra 24 hours, etc. What else could she possibly need?

[Eternium]

Originally posted by Brinny Baby

Britney's teen pop days are remembered. You actually think people forgot that Britney used to be a teen popstar

Toxicity is just trolling. He knows nothing he said is right but he wants to elicit a response so he can report someone, insult them and respond with something creative along the lines of "Why you mad?" or "You're delusional." It's the same thing in every thread.

[Dollas n Diamonds]

Originally posted by Eternium

"Love Story" has sold 5.7M in the U.S. SIO has sold 5.2M WW.

"You Belong With Me" has sold over 4M in the U.S. BS has done 3.5M WW.

Taylor peaked with her second album and that peak wasn't even half as big as Britney's. Then again, I can't expect you to be knowledgeable when you don't even know Taylor's stats.

The 80s has a different roof thanks to the introduction of new media types like cassettes, CDs, etc. It's part of why the 90s look so big thanks to the creation of CDs and the rush to replace cassettes which made catalogue sales bigger than ever.

If Taylor's peak is as big as Britney's then she should have no problem approaching that roof.

Except she couldn't with an extra day, digital music, more retailers, Starbucks, Papa John's, discounts, a considerably lower average price, the end of daylight savings time adding another extra hour to her extra 24 hours, etc. What else could she possibly need?

1989 is obviously gonna eclipse Fearless wtf comparing her 2009 singles to the ones that came out six months ago

And as for the bolded:no

[ImmaSlave4u]

Maybe if you're really young you'd think so.

Taylor is big but Britney was EVERYWHERE and EVERYTHING.
I'm honestly not sure if anyone will ever touch her level of relevancy.

[Superpower]

DUH!!

[Eternium]

Originally posted by Dollas n Diamonds

1989 is obviously gonna eclipse Fearless wtf comparing her 2009 singles to the ones that came out six months ago

And as for the bolded:no

Her HDD sales were below 1.3M and included 99 cent copies of her album.

1989 has a great chance at surpassing Fearless but it hasn't yet. Red was also supposed to surpass Fearless and then fell off in January. Don't count your eggs before they hatch.

[Rainsford]

Originally posted by ImmaSlave4u

Maybe if you're really young you'd think so.

Taylor is big but Britney was EVERYWHERE and EVERYTHING.
I'm honestly not sure if anyone will ever touch her level of relevancy.

I'm 20 and I can say Taylor>Britney.

[MM3]

Yep!

[Kisuke]

She is heading that way, While Britney has higher sales she had no longevity in her career. So if Taylor can keep stable for another 4 years then yes.

[KareBear]

Omg at people dragging me and my fave
I'm not a delusional Taylor fan, I'm just really bored/sick in bed and was trolling
Obviously Britney is the princess of pop who had massive impact and influenced many pop girls. Nobody from the 00s/10s can reach her status.
Stop dragging Taylor now

[Dollas n Diamonds]

Originally posted by Eternium

Her HDD sales were below 1.3M and included 99 cent copies of her album.

1989 has a great chance at surpassing Fearless but it hasn't yet. Red was also supposed to surpass Fearless and then fell off in January. Don't count your eggs before they hatch.

No the pitiful amount sold on the google phone app wasn't counted also Papa John's was red ALSO, they were sold at full price.

The chickens have almost already hatched in a 1989 is only 500k away from Red's total and will out sell it in the US in a matter of weeks

[Dollas n Diamonds]

Also Taylor selling 1.2m in 2014 is much more impressive that Britney 1.3M in 2000

[ImmaSlave4u]

Originally posted by ianBK4

I'm 20 and I can say Taylor>Britney.

You're also the #1 Britney hater on this site.
Don't try and act like you're not completely transparent

[Eternium]

Originally posted by ianBK4

I'm 20 and I can say Taylor>Britney.

You're from Brazil so I'll call ********. I'm from the U.S. and 21 and you aren't fooling anyone

Originally posted by Kisuke

She is heading that way, While Britney has higher sales she had no longevity in her career. So if Taylor can keep stable for another 4 years then yes.

Her third album sold more than Fearless. Her fourth album sold more than every Taylor album except Fearless. Her GH album sold more than every Taylor album except Fearless. Etc. How is that "no longevity?"

Originally posted by Dollas n Diamonds

No the pitiful amount sold on the google phone app wasn't counted also Papa John's was red ALSO, they were sold at full price.

The chickens have almost already hatched in a 1989 is only 500k away from Red's total and will out sell it in the US in a matter of weeks

She hit 1.316M with 1989 when the 99 cent copies were counted. Because Billboard excludes them, she lost 27k copies and debuted with 1.289M copies.

Red did not do better than Fearless WW. It did better than Fearless outside the U.S. but Fearless is Taylor's biggest era WW.

Originally posted by KareBear

Omg at people dragging me and my fave
I'm not a delusional Taylor fan, I'm just really bored/sick in bed and was trolling
Obviously Britney is the princess of pop who had massive impact and influenced many pop girls. Nobody from the 00s/10s can reach her status.
Stop dragging Taylor now

Buy Britney Jean on iTunes and your trolling will be forgiven