Quote:
Originally posted by Eternium
It completely does. Billboard didn't change the rules, yet. That would be like me saying Taylor's opening "doesn't count" because her albums are being sold considerably cheaper than albums from 2000 or because she had an extra day of sales. You can't just decide someone's achievement "doesn't count" 
You literally have nothing to say other than "The ARMY IS FUMING!" yet no Army member is in here having a meltdown. The only people in their feelings are the usual trolls and it's highlighted by the fact that you can't even respond to what I said with my post but instead revert to "THE ARMY IS MELTING DOWN." Lay off the tacky gifs, generalizations and bandwagoning for your own sake, Rolland.
Clocking you for trolling isn't the same thing as fuming  I believe I also dragged you when you pretended to be a Madonna stan and use her receipts to "drag" Britney. This is no different. |
It's Gaga selling ~600K at full price versus Taylor selling three times in a row +1 milli at full price. But whatever makes you sleep at night, Taylor is still the only one who has opened with +1 milli three times in a row, which is the feat we're discussing as being way more impressive than Spears' feat 14 years ago so either way you lose.
Oh, really, I have nothing to say? What about the question that you have been avoiding all this time. Let me address it for you one more time, this time I expect and answer, to make things easier for you just answer YES or NO. If you avoid the question for the 4th time then you'll just expose your deluded ass.
Is it or isn't it more impressive to open with +1 milli three times in a row during the '10s (when album sales are in a historic low) than doing 1.3 million in early '00s (when albums sales were at their peak)?
YES or
NO
You all say you don't care yet you are here perched "clocking" trolls. Interesting reasoning.
