[hardbrit]

Originally posted by Retro

She claimed as early as 2005 that he had committed unspecified illegal acts against her. Nothing about their relationship seems to have ever been healthy.

Yet continued to work with him? make music with him? stay with him all these years?

[Andres]

So in 2011 he was suspected of doing this as well?

Hmm makes me think he's even more guilty...

[Vin]

Originally posted by Nicole

Why was she under oath in 2011?

This is the right question to be asking.
Stupid people ask the wrong questions, smart people ask the right questions.



1. Why was Kesha under oath in 2011?
2. In 2011, why would they ask Kesha if Dr. Luke roofied her?
3. In 2011, why would they ask Kesha if Dr. Luke sexually assaulted her?

Once again, this adds to Kesha's claims. It just means that the claims in the current 2014 lawsuit aren't "new claims."
And there is an actual history behind these claims. It makes Lukasz appear guilty, not Kesha. Dr. Luke's lawyer is a moron.

...Vin

[LP54]

Looks like Dr. Luke has a good lawyer. I hope Ke$ha got a good one as well.

[Sinister]

Originally posted by primo.

You're kidding right?

as a white man
i'm on this site for fun...most of the crap here isn't serious

i take my classes

[Afferty]

wow WoW WOW

[brandensuxx]

Originally posted by SebaMonster

The fact that she had to answer these questions in 2011 speaks volumes. She's definitely telling the truth.

.

[Grumpy Gills]

Originally posted by Ressti

Really? He's being accused of sexual assault by someone as far back as 2011...

She wasn't asked if he assaulted her tho, she asked if they ever had sex with her which is two very different things. In the court of public opinion this makes him look back but legally speaking this is a huge coup for him.

[*Tim]

omg mess.... Why did she speak under oath in 2011 tho?

[cherrygoddess]

Originally posted by hardbrit

Yet continued to work with him? make music with him? stay with him all these years?

Well when u are signed to a contract by the most powerful producer out there and are being threatened you will do anything to stay safe.

[Ressti]

Originally posted by Andres

So in 2011 he was suspected of doing this as well?

Hmm makes me think he's even more guilty...

Right.

Clearly there IS a history...

[TikiMiss]

I knew from the start that the accusations were fishily convenient guess this is proof

[Shigo]

HA I KNEW SHE LIED!!

[Sinister]

Originally posted by hardbrit

Yet continued to work with him? make music with him? stay with him all these years?

and???

that's like accusing abuse victims for staying with their abuser for years...you're just glossing over everything
it's never that simple

[Ressti]

Originally posted by Grumpy Gills

She wasn't asked if he assaulted her tho, she asked if they ever had sex with her which is two very different things. In the court of public opinion this makes him look back but legally speaking this is a huge coup for him.

No?

"Did Dr. Luke ever give you a roofie?"

[Superbitch]

Wait!! He's been accused of sexual abuse before? that says a lot

[rac7d]

Originally posted by Sinister

doesn't matter
psychologically...she has her reasons as to why she lied under oath

if her lawyer can prove it than she can get away with it...it happens all the time
it's not uncommon

So basicly its a game of who can out smart each other in court then


At this point then she gonna need physical evidence if she want ot win
otherwise......

[LP54]

Like I've said before this case is going to get ugly and make them both look bad as a result.

[Boniqua]

The people celebrating in this thread.

[TikiMiss]

Originally posted by Repo

Um, you guys realize the fact they asked her about this THREE YEARS AGO gives even more credence to her claims. It also fits up PERFECTLY with her claim that she was intimated out of telling the truth by Dr. Luke

she claimed she was roofed when she was 18, no? so this perfectly negates her lawsuit, hence why her lawyer is panicking and trying to keep it sealed