but if they asked her 3 years ago...then there must have been something going on from the start that would account for such questions to be asked in the first place
So she admits to perjury. That's fine tbh, the judge will offer a relaxed sentence for the circumstances (manipulation, threats of violence) and Kesha will get away with her dignity.
Dr. Luke will still have to let her out of the contract at the end of the day.
A simple 'no' from 2011 doesn't satisfy. Something seems fishy here. Why did she need to be asked this in 2011? What if Dr. Luke threatened her? Do you realize that the accusations Ke$ha put forward are too delicate to be used just to get out of a recording contract?
why?
