Quote:
Originally posted by Luc
you're missing the fact that the reviewer gave such a subjective premise to the entire review... no matter what they said later about the vocals, you already knew it was going to be dragged by the introduction. (same goes with positive reviews too btw). Just saying, this review was not objective. Anyone who says otherwise is delusional.
|
seriously though, every review starts with an introduction that kinda gives away the overall view of the journalist about the artist before starting the review. Ive read a lot of reviews for my idols and they all start in a positive or negative tone in the sub-headline or first paragraph. read some other reviews by other journalists of other records. the only singers or artists who don't get that treatment are the newbies - they get the neutral treatment. aside from those you can always tell what direction the review is gonna go.
the examiner however, now that is ********!
Poor Gags
