Quote:
Originally posted by Kool_Aid_King
How are you gonna post a freaking definition of what a musician is and then contradict it. This entire post is completely stupid.
I'm not reading this entire thing because at the end of the day:
Beyoncé is a musician who has complete control over what she does or has. There is no doubt about it. There's seriously no one on a label with THAT much control in what they do. She takes her craft seriously and she works her ass off to entertain and be a musician.
Sh is an "Actual" musician and you're just a music snob who probably barely listens to the Beatles but wanna be perceived as intelligent. Know your place.
The Beatles didn't invent music. The Beatles are not Gods to Music. The Beatles are not the only group to make an influence. They get accredited with too much, and that's something I believe in.
|
The bolded parts (and hints of irony)
But let's not. Know that the Beatles deserve the praise for the impact they made and the greater amount of control they had on their music alongside becoming the biggest phenomenon in music history.
Plus if you read the post you would have caught I did call Beyonce a musician. Like???
Also calling me a music snob on a pop music forum
Just because I know my music history doesn't make me a snob, it just goes to show my knowledge in music history.
"The Beatles are not the only group to make an influence"
This statement is true, but the fact your playing off the Beatles level of influence in the music industry as if Carly Rae Jespen had as much influence in music industry as them, like they are on her level.
sad
