[bluth]

USHER x DISCLOSURE coming tomorrow!

This could be great

[Jameson Teqkilla]

Originally posted by LoveTheWayILie

They are recording artists.
RECORDING as in it's the recorded material that matters. If they recorded material, the finished product is great then what is the problem if she can't belt live?

Britney's recorded voice is so generic and ****** that you can replace her with Myah Marie and the Army doesn't even know for months

[iHype.]

This was worth the $6.


Am kinda obsessed w/ NOW compilations. NOW 30 is being shipped to my house.

[GreasyBruce]

Originally posted by Jameson Teqkilla

There is proof that Rihanna can sound like she does in studio when she sings.

Britney has literally NEVER pulled off one of her songs live. She can't sing. She can just afford good processing.

If anybody could pull off Britney songs better than her then all the infinity of covers would be better. The Glee covers would be better. But they're not, because it's her timbre, her tone, her enunciation that make it special.

I could personally care less if it takes 50 takes, back up singers and melodyne to make it sound like it does. Because at the end of day when I hear "but it doesn't mean that I'm serious" and she does that thing where her voice becomes like a lick, a snap, a sexual lolita growl, it sounds amazing and gives me life and no one else can pull it off.

[rihannafan]

Originally posted by GreasyBruce

What is your problem? Everybody knows Britney can't sing live well, she forces her voice into that sexual lolita tone and it's ruined her voice + it's very difficult to maintain live. It's not a natural way of singing.

But on the record, it sounds fantastic! She's a great "studio vocalist", a bit like Rihanna, in that she has this unique, amazing tone that her producers can draw out but replicating it live is a very different issue.

ermm Rihanna's live voice is identical to the studio one in ballads...

[BoyOnBoy Wonder]

Originally posted by GreasyBruce

But they're not, because it's her timbre, her tone, her enunciation that make it special.

[Jameson Teqkilla]

Originally posted by GreasyBruce

If anybody could pull off Britney songs better than her then all the infinity of covers would be better. The Glee covers would be better. But they're not, because it's her timbre, her tone, her enunciation that make it special.

I could personally care less if it takes 50 takes, back up singers and melodyne to make it sound like it does. Because at the end of day when I hear "but it doesn't mean that I'm serious" and she does that thing where her voice becomes like a lick, a snap, a sexual lolita growl, it sounds amazing and gives me life and no one else can pull it off.

[Remixed]

Wait what's the tea on Britney not singing her own songs? i missed this

[rihannafan]

the head voice

has britney ever?

[thirdward]

I still can't believe that Brit has stans...

[BobBertran1992]

I hate William Orbit for giving the best tracks to Britney and Chris Brown

[Badger]

Originally posted by rihannafan

ermm Rihanna's live voice is identical to the studio one in ballads...

Ahah

[Shinning]

Originally posted by GreasyBruce

If anybody could pull off Britney songs better than her then all the infinity of covers would be better. The Glee covers would be better. But they're not, because it's her timbre, her tone, her enunciation that make it special.

I could personally care less if it takes 50 takes, back up singers and melodyne to make it sound like it does. Because at the end of day when I hear "but it doesn't mean that I'm serious" and she does that thing where her voice becomes like a lick, a snap, a sexual lolita growl, it sounds amazing and gives me life and no one else can pull it off.

This whole post

[Ecstasy]

Originally posted by Jameson Teqkilla

Britney's recorded voice is so generic and ****** that you can replace her with Myah Marie and the Army doesn't even know for months

What part of recorded music as in songs and albums do you not understand? What is so hard to understand that you can love a song like Gimme More despite it not having any shouting in it for what it is. A voice is supposed to fit the song. Britney's voice fits perfectly for the material she records and the finished product is great pop music so again what is the problem

[Halien4Life]

Rihfan

[GreasyBruce]

The Myah Marie thing is not true. It's a stupid unfounded rumour and we've heard her vocals many times and they are VERY different from Britney's. What she does is backing vocals, which is very normal in the industry.



Listen to the chorus with her vocals on it. It sounds completely different from Britney's voice and from the chorus on the official version of the track.

At this point some people just want to troll and be negative. But I have no space for negativity today.

[iHype.]

If these below average vocals make Britney Jean, this means they were the highlight.

Just image her vocals on an AVERAGE day.

I wonder does she just listen to herself sometimes and realize she's useless.

[BoyOnBoy Wonder]

Originally posted by Remixed

Wait what's the tea on Britney not singing her own songs? i missed this

Myah Marie is who sang 90% of BJ. Not Britney. On her most personal album.

[B-Luke]

Originally posted by Jameson Teqkilla

Britney's recorded voice is so generic and ****** that you can replace her with Myah Marie and the Army doesn't even know for months

I realized it the second I started playing Passenger the first time that it wasn't Britney. Something was off about it, I wasn't feeling it even though she tried to sound exactly like Britney (she obviously failed with these high and extended notes, Britney ain't doing this anymore). Maybe some Army members like me have developed a sense to detect a fake Brinty immediately. PROOF that her voice is unique.

[Elusive Chanteuse]

Originally posted by slobro

This one always kills me: Britney Spears sings Edge of Glory

wow lol