[BlueMoon77]

Originally posted by TheCheetahwings

Who keeps editing the Taylor Swift wiki? I'm screaming.

Good ****ing bye

[GeorgiaStars]

Originally posted by Val

Taylor's girl Selena even said "Taylor is so strong". I think Taylor been through some S**T. that stans don't even know about. But, the girl keeps it moving. All others fall apart through drugs, alcohol, depression or
sheer craziness.

I know we all look at Taylor as this rich, beautiful, young, tall and successful, but I believe she's a lonely old soul. I personally want her to have a life of Mandy Moore/Ryan Adams.or Brad Pitt/Angelina Jolie. It seems extreme on each side of the spectrum but it's what I imagine for Taylor. She's either gong to be low key or high-powered.

Defenitely. That's why I'm scared that after keeping it all on down low for 8 years (and more to come) she'll blow up one day. Or maybe I am underestimating her.

[GeorgiaStars]

Originally posted by Vine101

Same. But the thing is.... Taylor is only 24. That's soooooo young compared to legends. Joni Mitchell was 29 when she recorded one of her greatest works Blue.

Taylor said to that Alex Gold guy that "if she could go back 10 years, she would tell herself how great pop music is." She's young and pop music has always appealed to her, even in her Mixtape days. She wants to try it out. Scott is probably pushing her to pop anyway.

I want her to be proud of what she makes for LP5. We're all aware that she's gonna have her emotional All Too Well/Treacherous songs for LP5. An album of 22's is not even ideal for her company. She played All Too Well at the grammys for her fans. She knows what they like.

Yeah I agree, I always prefer quality but she has decades to do that and maybe only another couple of years on top like she is right now, so why not make the most of it?

[Vine101]

Originally posted by Val

Taylor's girl Selena even said "Taylor is so strong". I think Taylor been through some S**T. that stans don't even know about. But, the girl keeps it moving. All others fall apart through drugs, alcohol, depression or
sheer craziness.

I know we all look at Taylor as this rich, beautiful, young, tall and successful, but I believe she's a lonely old soul. I personally want her to have a life of Mandy Moore/Ryan Adams.or Brad Pitt/Angelina Jolie. It seems extreme on each side of the spectrum but it's what I imagine for Taylor. She's either gong to be low key or high-powered.

People call Taylor "fake" and an "attention *****" because she seems so perfect and she seems to befriend/date the newest thing.

But you know what. Taylor is extremely calculating about her career and she knows what she wants. As much as people view her as a serial dater, she always puts her career first before her love life.

People love to see her heartbroken and lonely because of the amazing music she puts out.

In Fifteen she says "Back then I swore I was gonna marry him someday but I realized some bigger dreams of mine" That summons up her career.

[Vine101]

Originally posted by GeorgiaStars

Yeah I agree, I always perfect quality but he has decades to do that and maybe only another couple of years on top like she is right now, so why not make the most of it?

Exactly, she's not gonna waste the global audience that she got from RED.

[TheCheetahwings]

Oh my god. I tried to change the Taylor Wiki to something else and it "fixed itself" back to:



Imagine if it stays like this forever

[BlueMoon77]

Did somebody actually say that Taylor has no critical acclaim whatsoever?!




They just say whatever their opinions are, and state them as if it is the truth.




Bless

[TheCheetahwings]

Originally posted by BlueMoon77

Did somebody actually say that Taylor has no critical acclaim whatsoever?!




They just say whatever their opinions are, and state them as if it is the truth.




Bless

It's cute that they think Taylor isn't critically acclaimed.
I mean, what does that say about their faves?

[Icannot]

Originally posted by BlueMoon77

Did somebody actually say that Taylor has no critical acclaim whatsoever?!




They just say whatever their opinions are, and state them as if it is the truth.




Bless

'Critical' acclaim is when you have at least one album that has scored more than 80 on Metacritic.

[Vine101]

Originally posted by Icannot

'Critical' acclaim is when you have at least one album that has scored more than 80 on Metacritic.

AOTY > 80 metascore

[TheCheetahwings]

Originally posted by Icannot

'Critical' acclaim is when you have at least one album that has scored more than 80 on Metacritic.

I'd consider every album having 70/100+ critical acclaim Hopefully her next album gets even more praise. Plus she's received numerous Grammys, including AOTY. She's definitely critically acclaimed.

[castle13]

Originally posted by TheCheetahwings

Who keeps editing the Taylor Swift wiki? I'm screaming.

OMFG

[castle13]

Originally posted by Luke Hayes

Now:

A mess

[BlueMoon77]

Originally posted by Icannot

'Critical' acclaim is when you have at least one album that has scored more than 80 on Metacritic.

And a Grammy for AOTY doesn't fall into that category?

[Icannot]

Originally posted by Vine101

AOTY > 80 metascore

No.

Originally posted by TheCheetahwings

I'd consider every album having 70/100+ critical acclaim Hopefully her next album gets even more praise. Plus she's received numerous Grammys, including AOTY. She's definitely critically acclaimed.

Not how it works.

[GeorgiaStars]

I laugh whenever someone says their fave will be more remembered or is more criticaly acclaimed...
I mean unless their fave is Adele, Beyoncé (or others on that level) they can't claim their fave will be more remembered if they are Katy, Gaga, Rihanna, etc. Unless they mean in term of shocking the GP, then yeah....

[castle13]

^LOL

A Grammy is actually voted by hundreds of critics whereas you can get 80 MS from only 9 critics

[WayTooHonest13]

Originally posted by Icannot

'Critical' acclaim is when you have at least one album that has scored more than 80 on Metacritic.

Taylor Swift's 81 says hihihi

[Vine101]

Originally posted by Icannot

No.



Not how it works.

Yes indeed. No one in the GP would remember a score from an irrelevant ass website that no one but internet bottoms check.

Everybody remembers an AOTY win, nonetheless the youngest recipient to ever win one.

[TheCheetahwings]

Originally posted by Icannot

Not how it works.

How does it work then? Sure they're not calling them the best albums of all time, but they're all very high.

Also wasn't Speak Now over 80 at one point before one review knocked it down? That just shows how "accurate" Metacritic is.