All Music - 80
LA Times - 75
Pop Matters - 70
The Independent - 60
How about Kitty Empire's in The Observer/Guardian? Have to say my heart sunk when I saw her name on the review and my fears were, sort of, well founded.
How about Kitty Empire's in The Observer/Guardian? Have to say my heart sunk when I saw her name on the review and my fears were, sort of, well founded.
Would it really fall all the way down to 70 just because of that one 60 review?
No, it's still above 70.
Quote:
Originally posted by Azealia Banks
Bad reviews are coming, it was good while it last.
Plot twist: that Pitchfork lady prasises UV on her Twitter and Lana stans are out of control and attack her. That one dude keeps on bragging how he is gonna drag on UV on his Twitter, nobody reports him.
Plot twist: that Pitchfork lady prasises UV on her Twitter and Lana stans are out of control and attack her. That one dude keeps on bragging how he is gonna drag on UV on his Twitter, nobody reports him.
Plot twist: that Pitchfork lady prasises UV on her Twitter and Lana stans are out of control and attack her. That one dude keeps on bragging how he is gonna drag on UV on his Twitter, nobody reports him.
Well, another proof that those scores are based on hype and sensation rather than quality.
That makes no sense. BTD was way more hyped up than Ultraviolence. Ultraviolence is a much better album than BTD and Paradise. The writing and production are many steps ahead of anything she has done before. I think it's amazing that she's growing as an artist and people are noticing.
