Quote:
Originally posted by gloamingtheplain
Windows Defender just defends, it doesn't attack.
Macs are premium, Apple make enough money per Mac to allow the OS per Mac to be free.
Windows don't make any money of laptops, just the OS. They barely make a cent in the grand scheme of things when it comes to Surface.
Windows 7 is considered one of the best Windows OS, if not the best. And it all it was was a behind the scenes fix of Windows Vista. So most Mac OS's are behind the scenes. So why cristised that when Windows only see success when they do that?
Windows doesn't get praised later. Windows Vista is still in the pits, and the jokes about Windows 8 haven't stopped. The next version of Windows 8 is nothing like the first version (as you can see in the pics). So  If it was praise later, why are they completely changing the OS?
And no. Apple are just comparing adaption rate. If people really wanted Windows 8, they would but it. Like they did with Windows 7. This free OS excuse can't be pulled into play when people had no hesitation upgrading to previous versions of Windows. People just don't want Windows 8. Which is why Windows 8 is nothing like it was when it launched.
iOS 5 was well praised and so was Mavericks. I don't know what you're trying there?
Windows XP was bashed because of change. It was later praised. Windows Vista has never been praised and Windows 8 won't ever be either.
|
GERL what exactly is the meaning of your first sentence?
Microsoft is an Operating System company that's been extended to the consumer electronics market. Of course they'd sell Operating Systems. Especially the one that's been ruling that market share for the past 20 years. While the Surface isn't that much of a success, the fact that they still keep it going is a hint that it meets a certain demand.
Quote:
Windows 7 is considered one of the best Windows OS, if not the best. And it all it was was a behind the scenes fix of Windows Vista. So most Mac OS's are behind the scenes. So why cristised that when Windows only see success when they do that?
|
Sorry but what?
Yes and no. Windows Vista is STILL the pits for computers running on old hardware but it works fine on PCs with greater hardware. That was the fault of Microsoft, they once thought that making the OS a spec heavy one will be moving forward apparently it wasn't. It's not **** by any means, it's just counter productive. Yes it's not an improvement looks-wise but it will be a solid update to their hybrid OS. People do not want change. That's it. Windows 8 is a perfectly fine OS and again, a RAM efficient version of Windows 7. I mean Windows 7 had better efficiency than XP and Vista but 8 is much more than what 7 was. and Again, PEOPLE WANT FREE THINGS. If the update for Windows 8 is FREE they'd get it.
Yep, they were initially praised but the bugs came in. A LOT of them.
Windows XP and Windows 95. 98 and now Windows 8. People love to complain anything about Microsoft.
They complained about adding the Start Menu before, they are now complaining about the lack of it. If you look at Microsoft's history, you'd see where I'm going with this.
Let's not start with the underground praise for the Zune.