TEA is track equivalent album. So it basically means that 10 singles sold = 1 album sold in which case Katys 60 million or so singles sold equal 6 million albums.
Quote:
Originally posted by I. AX
LOUD, GGGB, IASF, DIL have all outsold it.
I thought he meant released since then. In that case you are right
because after the costs of her 200+ dates tour is paid off, they'll be barely enough profit and when u 34% that , clearly u see why Rihanna would pocket more.
Rihanna has a 360 deal, her label gets a chunk of her pay from her tour.
Katy doesn't.
I think the point the Navy tries to make is that Katy puts in a lot more work to get the numbers she does. And that work costs money, so who really knows what was actually profited.
What's better?
Making 10 million but having spent 7 million to fund it.........or making 7 million but only spending 2-3 million to fund it. The first is katy and the second is rihanna, basically.
Its that simple.
Rih is more viable than katy, anyway you look at it.
On NBC, Mariah Carey: At Home In Concert With Matt Lauer scored a 0.4 adults 18-49 rating, matching the performance of the network's Coldplay special on Sunday, May 18.
The video was released at the wrong time and there's been no promo outside the performance. The video should have been released the day after the performance (and a different video at that).
Where did she perform it? It must've been a long time ago cause after radio stopped adding her the song was practically freefalling.
TD was "immensely more successful" than LOUD a part from the fact that the California Dreams Tour could barely scrap up a 60M gross? . Slightly more successful, yes considering all of the marketing. Immensely more successful? No.
HELL no
. Slightly more successful, yes considering all of the marketing. Immensely more successful? No.
