TD was immensely more successful than LOUD. Singles, albums, etc. Rihanna did tour better though.
We don't know how many Katy's going to do, but if she does do anywhere close to 200, then her gross will be 200M+.
LOUD sold more than TD and is still selling more than It.
LOUD tour was bigger than CDT too.
And she didnt sell that many singles more before the re release.
TD was immensely more successful than LOUD. Singles, albums, etc. Rihanna did tour better though.
We don't know how many Katy's going to do, but if she does do anywhere close to 200, then her gross will be 200M+.
Please define "immensely more successful" relative to the amount of promotion and the fact that it had a re-release, movie, and lasted for 2 years.
The last single from Taylor's album was released in March 2013 and the last single from Rihanna's album was released 6 months ago + she had The Monster and Can't Remember to Forget You.
If both Rihanna and Katy take home 34%(standard) of each gross and Katy's tour makes more than how isn't she making more?
because after the costs of her 200+ dates tour is paid off, they'll be barely enough profit and when u 34% that , clearly u see why Rihanna would pocket more.
I think the point the Navy tries to make is that Katy puts in a lot more work to get the numbers she does. And that work costs money, so who really knows what was actually profited.
What's better?
Making 10 million but having spent 7 million to fund it.........or making 7 million but only spending 2-3 million to fund it. The first is katy and the second is rihanna, basically.
relative to the amount of promotion and the fact that it had a re-release, movie, and lasted for 2 years.
