Quote:
Originally posted by Rusty
Are you for real?
You have an online collection of anti-Gaga articles you screenshot over months and anti-Gaga gifs that you use around the forum. You went on about how the Guinness World Record tweet about ARTPOP's discounting couldn't possibly be fake and then they tweeted confirming it was fake. You pretend to be impartial by using flop receipts that you go out of you way to compile for the sake of bashing Lady Gaga, and Lady Gaga alone. That online collection you denied owning (which weirdly became private after you got scalped) had only two sets of images: anti-Gaga (most images) and pro-Madonna images (the rest). That's an agenda.
 |
Yes I am for real. The online "collection" you refer to, is a photo bucket account that has every picture and article I have posted on here to reply and respond or to create threads. I joined photobucket because of ATRL and the "collection" started when my comments started.
I went on about the GWR things because it appeared to be real and guess what, when I saw it wasn't - I said it wasn't.
I said I was wrong. I'm more than happy to say when I am wrong.
Back to the photobucket thing, it's a perfect example of how you and many like you can't stand the facts. I give you a fact, you say "oh he has a collection of gaga hate" - Even tho, it may not have anything to do with the topic at hand. Your goal: to discredit anything I say because again, you can't handle what I'm saying but it doesn't work, why? - Because I don't have the responsibility of explaining where I source my gifs from to a bunch of overly sensitive gaga fans that can't stand to see something TINY (but true) taken away from their fave. I can source my info from wherever I want and you'll find I also often provide the links to the original page, billboard, forbes, pollstar - wherever. BTW 90 percent of it, is Madonna. 10 percent is the gaga info which I have used in my comments here. There's also no "weirdness" about it being private. I asked for it to be made private and I don't have to explain my decisions to you.
Quote:
Originally posted by Retro
Now hold up. Whatever you think about the fairness, the warnings we distribute are based only upon the interpretation of solid rules. We minimize our opinion in such a way that the only way it is involved is in determining whether a post breaks a rule; to put it more simply, if you break a rule you get warned and if you don't, you don't. That's it.
|
It was a compliment, I was saying you guys do a great job. It says in the rules that the rules are subjective so being that they are subjective I was saying for the most part your guys fairly give the WP's. - I pretty much said what you just said but perhaps worded poorly. Apologies. I certainly have always felt (for the most part) the mods do a great job for what they have to work with.
That deleted thread
