Quote:
Originally posted by Gatsby
 Most of the stress I had has been lifted off of me, luckily. There's not really much else I have to worry about at this point except just keeping up with these last-minute assignments so I can graduate. Right now I have no grades below a C, but that could change easily if I forget to do just one thing. If I fail just one class, I either won't graduate or I'll have to fully depend my last 4 years of working solely on my final exam.
Ch, the first one was amazing (no pun intended.) The second one looks even better from the 35023823598 previews, clips and snippets we got.
My review from months back
Yeah.  Well, luckily for me it's only a small amount of people I'll miss, but they're still solid human beings. 
|
I hope you're right but I've been reading online reviews and they've all been very mixed. Take a look...
"Superhero sequels are rarely exercises in restraint, so it comes as little surprise that The Amazing Spider-Man 2 attempts to be bigger and bolder than its predecessor. Critics say the result is something of a mixed bag -- while the cast is outstanding and the special effects are top-notch, the latest installment of the Spidey saga suffers from an unfocused narrative and an overabundance of characters. This time out, Peter Parker (Andrew Garfield) has a lot on his mind: his relationship with Gwen Stacy (Emma Stone)is fraught with complications, and he becomes increasingly haunted when new information about the deaths of his parents comes to light. As if that wasn't enough, our hero must protect the city from the likes of Electro (Jamie Foxx) and the Rhino (Paul Giamatti). The pundits say that
Garfield and Stone share a genuine onscreen chemistry, and the big action set-pieces are visually striking, but the bloated runtime and jarring tonal shifts keep The Amazing Spider-Man 2 from scaling the heights established by previous Spider-Man flicks."
They really are great together and that's part of what made me like the first movie. I hope I'm slayed, but we'll see...
