[LilyAllen]

The monsters will never learn

[TikiMiss]

Originally posted by bluth

Because Britney was bigger at the time? Again, these receipts belong in a filing cabinet along with tamagotchis and gameboy colors, especially when you're bringing up names in your own post who are still going strong

your excuse was that Britney came from a time when albums were just flying off shelves yet I clocked you with the fact that those three huge acts are also from that time period, and have yet to, combined, outsell Britney

You would think that the World was filled with popstars that have sold about 100 million albums and that they all came from the late 1990s

[Trent W]

Originally posted by alfonso12

The fact that everyone is talking about old sales and no one understands that the OP is talking about today's charts.

He's comparing a retired popstar vs a current one who has just fallen from grace 5 years into her career, of course we are using old receipts

[ItsJim]

you know Gaga is done when the monsters are comparing her to Britney

[Yourfavefan]

Monsters trying it

[Bad Influence]

Wait then why is Cher's burlesque ahead of both?

724. Various Artists - Burlesque (Original Motion Picture Soundtrack)
999. Britney Spears - Britney Jean (Deluxe Version)
1122. Lady Gaga - The Fame Monster (Deluxe Version)

I demand Justice!!!1!

[Arcadius]

If Britney stans shouldn't use old receipts then this whole thread is pointless from the Monsters. That's like if I were to make a thread asking why did Usher's Confessions sell more than MJ's Invincible album, two artists from two completely different generations. The Monsters should instead compare Gaga to Katy, Rihanna, or Lana but they won't bc they don't wanna embarrass their fave.

[ItsJim]

Originally posted by TikiMiss

your excuse was that Britney came from a time when albums were just flying off shelves yet I clocked you with the fact that those three huge acts are also from that time period, and have yet to, combined, outsell Britney

You would think that the World was filled with popstars that have sold about 100 million albums and that they all came from the late 1990s

CLOCKED

[Remixed]

Originally posted by Trent W

He's comparing a retired popstar vs a current one who has just fallen from grace 5 years into her career, of course we are using old receipts

Retired artists don't release new albums...? am confused?

[jomarr]

Originally posted by LilyAllen

The monsters will never learn

That's why I never want to be that G.U.Y.

[~Lexi~]

She also has that event in New York that has been giving her some new press.

[Shelter]

Poor BJ. Tragic.

[ontherocks]

Originally posted by Remixed

Hi, we're in 2014 now. Use current stats

Let's better not use current stats for a Gaga alberm

[Frozen99]

Originally posted by NaughtyDog

its the army, they only live for the past

And monsters comparing BJ to TFM aren't?

[Saint]

This entire thread

[BeBeMint]

Not the OP still creeping this thread. THE THIRST is UNQUENCHABLE

[Trent W]

Originally posted by Remixed

Retired artists don't release new albums...? am confused?

Britney obviously retired after circus, she just released these albums to get out of her contract, and still outsold GAGA with FF LMAOOO

[RomanNavy]

You want to use current stats for a pop star who has been in the game 15 years vs one that has been here like 5.
If Gaga's 4th album already did this bad, I wanna see how her 8th is doing (if she still has a record deal)

[bluth]

Originally posted by TikiMiss

your excuse was that Britney came from a time when albums were just flying off shelves yet I clocked you with the fact that those three huge acts are also from that time period, and have yet to, combined, outsell Britney

Those names are completely moot to the entire comparison though. This is about Gaga v Britney currently, so of course the army swans in like a bunch of 'only 90's kids will understand this'-memes and turn it into Britney vs other artists in the past

Originally posted by Arcadius

If Britney stans shouldn't use old receipts then this whole thread is pointless from the Monsters. That's like if I were to make a thread asking why did Usher's Confessions sell more than MJ's Invincible album, two artists from two completely different generations. The Monsters should instead compare Gaga to Katy, Rihanna, or Lana but they won't bc they don't wanna embarrass their fave.

So Gaga has to be compared to her peers and Britney isn't, instead only being allowed to be compared to others around at her peak? The logic

[BYoncé]

If we're gonna use old stats how about we talk about Gaga having 12 top ten songs in 5 years compared to Britney having 11 in 17 years