| |
News: Gay marriage is 'Extra rights'
Member Since: 8/4/2012
Posts: 759
|
Quote:
Originally posted by DOMINO
One thing I can't stand is that gay people think everyone who doesn't support them all the way is "stupid".
I'm visiting one of Germany's best universities. So your point is invalid, too.
|
 Its like, if you don't agree with them you are ignorant, self centered and closed minded. Its like people, you have your own opinions, I have mine now please stop cramming gay marriage down my throat. 
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/1/2014
Posts: 1,447
|
Quote:
Originally posted by ks_dollar
My point is 100% justified. I clearly explained to you why your "argument" is invalid and what marriage is about.
Really? Cool! Why don't you explain to the politicians of countries that allow gay marriage that gay marriage should be banned because you go to one of Germany's best universities.
|
+1, 
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/1/2014
Posts: 39,650
|
Quote:
Originally posted by NewRihannaStan
But who cares if people will accept it . I don't accept people having sex with animals or straight people cheating on their spouse completely ruining the sanctity of marriage . I don't accept it but at the end of the day it is not my business too .
The main issue is people need to mind their own damn business.. Because 9/10 those bigots have skeletons in their closets
|
Clock me sis
We could compare this to the civil rights movement in the 50s/60s.
People didn't have rights, but slowly fought for them. People were mad, but at the end of the day, you were equal under law
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/3/2014
Posts: 4,012
|
Quote:
Originally posted by DOMINO
God, go get that right and get married. I don't care.
If you really want people to talk bad about you then just go for it.
I didn't say it's against my norms. I just don't understand why you would wanna do that to yourselves.
|
I already went through the strife of living in the closet, I endured the backlash of coming out, but what doesn't kill me made me stronger and it made me more of an open minded person because of it. I'm so beyond what people think of me and my sexuality, If I'm making their pitiful life miserable because I married someone of the same sex, then YAY ME, it doesn't make that one day any less of a beautiful thing for me.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/1/2014
Posts: 39,650
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Soapysteven
+1,
the caption for this doee
*lol i cant take this down if you want
|
sis, take it down, you'll get in trouble 
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/17/2011
Posts: 9,573
|
Quote:
Originally posted by BGKC
I already went through the strife of living in the closet, I endured the backlash of coming out, but what doesn't kill me made me stronger and it made me more of an open minded person because of it. I'm so beyond what people think of me and my sexuality, If I'm making their pitiful life miserable because I married someone of the same sex, then YAY ME, it doesn't make that one day any less of a beautiful thing.
|
You go girl.

|
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/1/2014
Posts: 39,650
|
Quote:
Originally posted by BlondGuts
 Its like, if you don't agree with them you are ignorant, self centered and closed minded. Its like people, you have your own opinions, I have mine now please stop cramming gay marriage down my throat. 
|
I agree that you have your own opinion, I respect that. But saying marriage is exclusively between a man and a woman is pure ignorance.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/31/2013
Posts: 13,040
|
Quote:
Originally posted by SixWholeYears
Marriage as a concept is overrated between any sex though, why stuck with one person forever?
Just let it go gheys.

|
This. Marriage needs to die out all together. We don't need more of it.
The concept of marriage is so backwards.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/17/2013
Posts: 3,555
|
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 5/29/2012
Posts: 26,389
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Soapysteven
+1, 
|
haha i don't mind if people post my photos
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/21/2012
Posts: 55,134
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Buddyc614
Clock me sis
We could compare this to the civil rights movement in the 50s/60s.
People didn't have rights, but slowly fought for them. People were mad, but at the end of the day, you were equal under law
|
We could compare the two. And exactly you get my point 
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/1/2014
Posts: 1,447
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Buddyc614
sis, take it down, you'll get in trouble 
|
 Thanks
Quote:
Originally posted by ks_dollar
haha i don't mind if people post my photos
|
Haha took it down anyways, funny tho
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/31/2013
Posts: 6,568
|
Quote:
Originally posted by DOMINO
IMO marriage means wanting a family. And a family with two dads will only hurt a child.
|
That's a standard response to the notion of gay adoption. Here is why it is faulty: - It is scientifically and sociologically disproven. Check Bridget Fitzgerald research and work regarding child development.The consensus of the study is that parent's sexual orientation has no effect on child development.
- There's also Gregory Herek's findings which also support those findings.
- A 25 on going study by UoC found that children of homosexual parents actually: "ere rated significantly higher in social, school/academic, and total competence and significantly lower in social problems, rule-breaking, aggressive, and externalizing problem behavior than their age-matched counterparts in Achenbach's normative sample of American youth"
- This is also supported by the University of Pittsburgh which found evidence to support that.
And this is just some of the evidence off the top of my head.
Now lets broaden the talk to discuss the notion of marriage in general. Why do gay people want to get married? - Lets start with the plain fact that a majority of homosexual people recognise themselves with the ideals of atheism or agnosticism. So by large that takes religion and "the recognition of their union by god" out of the equation.
- Going further and back to the notion of adoption. Civil partnerships and non-married individuals have a harder time when going through the adoption process. In fact many don't even get approval based on the fact that they are not married.
- Expanding it further. Here in the year 2014 it is sociologically observed that many individuals united in a romantic and/or sexual relationship do not actually have children. So taking it back to the notion that they're not getting married to just have a perfect nuclear family as it's slowly but surely becoming a more archaic modal in day to day life.
- How about the rights awarded to individuals who are married? Marriage officially (as in legally) indoctrinates people into the other's respective family. As such they receive benefits that a non married couple does not. Those benefits include taxes for example and allows them to merge their assets with one another. Also (and quite importantly) it awards the married individuals certain rights in regards to the health system. I'm sure you've heard about those things, like the power of attorney and hell even to visit and take care of your spouse in a hospital.
Now all the previous I've mentioned is literally skimming the bare surface minimum on the subject matter but let me ask you this one more time however: What don't you understand about "the gays" (aka two people who are of sound mind willfully making that commitment to one another) wanting to get married again?

|
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/1/2014
Posts: 6,332
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Meowster
You've said nothing but the truth, it is astoundingly, incredibly pathetic that politics are still acting like it is some ****ing platform when it is human decency and human rights. There are real issues to be worrying about and being purposefully evil when you are in charge of a nation (I.e congress) is disgusting.
|
Seriously...
Quote:
Originally posted by Silence.
That's a standard response to the notion of gay adoption. Here is why it is faulty: - It is scientifically and sociologically disproven. Check Bridget Fitzgerald research and work regarding child development.The consensus of the study is that parent's sexual orientation has no effect on child development.
- There's also Gregory Herek's findings which also support those findings.
- A 25 on going study by UoC found that children of homosexual parents actually: "ere rated significantly higher in social, school/academic, and total competence and significantly lower in social problems, rule-breaking, aggressive, and externalizing problem behavior than their age-matched counterparts in Achenbach's normative sample of American youth"
- This is also supported by the University of Pittsburgh which found evidence to support that.
And this is just some of the evidence off the top of my head.
Now lets broaden the talk to discuss the notion of marriage in general. Why do gay people want to get married? - Lets start with the plain fact that a majority of homosexual people recognise themselves with the ideals of atheism or agnosticism. So by large that takes religion and "the recognition of their union by god" out of the equation.
- Going further and back to the notion of adoption. Civil partnerships and non-married individuals have a harder time when going through the adoption process. In fact many don't even get approval based on the fact that they are not married.
- Expanding it further. Here in the year 2014 it is sociologically observed that many individuals united in a romantic and/or sexual relationship do not actually have children. So taking it back to the notion that they're not getting married to just have a perfect nuclear family as it's slowly but surely becoming a more archaic modal in day to day life.
- How about the rights awarded to individuals who are married? Marriage officially (as in legally) indoctrinates people into the other's respective family. As such they receive benefits that a non married couple does not. Those benefits include taxes for example and allows them to merge their assets with one another. Also (and quite importantly) it awards the married individuals certain rights in regards to the health system. I'm sure you've heard about those things, like the power of attorney and hell even to visit and take care of your spouse in a hospital.
Now all the previous I've mentioned is literally skimming the bare surface minimum on the subject matter but let me ask you this one more time however: What don't you understand about "the gays" (aka two people who are of sound mind willfully making that commitment to one another) wanting to get married again?

|
Wow 
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 4/27/2011
Posts: 2,243
|
But how can it be an extra right, when it's a basic human right that the gay community doesn't have?
If anything, as of now, it stands as an "extra right" for heterosexuals, and not homosexuals as he claims.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 5/29/2012
Posts: 26,389
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Silence.
That's a standard response to the notion of gay adoption. Here is why it is faulty: - It is scientifically and sociologically disproven. Check Bridget Fitzgerald research and work regarding child development.The consensus of the study is that parent's sexual orientation has no effect on child development.
- There's also Gregory Herek's findings which also support those findings.
- A 25 on going study by UoC found that children of homosexual parents actually: "ere rated significantly higher in social, school/academic, and total competence and significantly lower in social problems, rule-breaking, aggressive, and externalizing problem behavior than their age-matched counterparts in Achenbach's normative sample of American youth"
- This is also supported by the University of Pittsburgh which found evidence to support that.
And this is just some of the evidence off the top of my head.
Now lets broaden the talk to discuss the notion of marriage in general. Why do gay people want to get married? - Lets start with the plain fact that a majority of homosexual people recognise themselves with the ideals of atheism or agnosticism. So by large that takes religion and "the recognition of their union by god" out of the equation.
- Going further and back to the notion of adoption. Civil partnerships and non-married individuals have a harder time when going through the adoption process. In fact many don't even get approval based on the fact that they are not married.
- Expanding it further. Here in the year 2014 it is sociologically observed that many individuals united in a romantic and/or sexual relationship do not actually have children. So taking it back to the notion that they're not getting married to just have a perfect nuclear family as it's slowly but surely becoming a more archaic modal in day to day life.
- How about the rights awarded to individuals who are married? Marriage officially (as in legally) indoctrinates people into the other's respective family. As such they receive benefits that a non married couple does not. Those benefits include taxes for example and allows them to merge their assets with one another. Also (and quite importantly) it awards the married individuals certain rights in regards to the health system. I'm sure you've heard about those things, like the power of attorney and hell even to visit and take care of your spouse in a hospital.
Now all the previous I've mentioned is literally skimming the bare surface minimum on the subject matter but let me ask you this one more time however: What don't you understand about "the gays" (aka two people who are of sound mind willfully making that commitment to one another) wanting to get married again?

|
 thank you.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/18/2013
Posts: 21,558
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Daydream
This. Marriage needs to die out all together. We don't need more of it.
The concept of marriage is so backwards.
|
The point isn't even marriage, it's having the same right as straights I mean chh...
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/1/2014
Posts: 59,596
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Silence.
That's a standard response to the notion of gay adoption. Here is why it is faulty: - It is scientifically and sociologically disproven. Check Bridget Fitzgerald research and work regarding child development.The consensus of the study is that parent's sexual orientation has no effect on child development.
- There's also Gregory Herek's findings which also support those findings.
- A 25 on going study by UoC found that children of homosexual parents actually: "ere rated significantly higher in social, school/academic, and total competence and significantly lower in social problems, rule-breaking, aggressive, and externalizing problem behavior than their age-matched counterparts in Achenbach's normative sample of American youth"
- This is also supported by the University of Pittsburgh which found evidence to support that.
And this is just some of the evidence off the top of my head.
Now lets broaden the talk to discuss the notion of marriage in general. Why do gay people want to get married? - Lets start with the plain fact that a majority of homosexual people recognise themselves with the ideals of atheism or agnosticism. So by large that takes religion and "the recognition of their union by god" out of the equation.
- Going further and back to the notion of adoption. Civil partnerships and non-married individuals have a harder time when going through the adoption process. In fact many don't even get approval based on the fact that they are not married.
- Expanding it further. Here in the year 2014 it is sociologically observed that many individuals united in a romantic and/or sexual relationship do not actually have children. So taking it back to the notion that they're not getting married to just have a perfect nuclear family as it's slowly but surely becoming a more archaic modal in day to day life.
- How about the rights awarded to individuals who are married? Marriage officially (as in legally) indoctrinates people into the other's respective family. As such they receive benefits that a non married couple does not. Those benefits include taxes for example and allows them to merge their assets with one another. Also (and quite importantly) it awards the married individuals certain rights in regards to the health system. I'm sure you've heard about those things, like the power of attorney and hell even to visit and take care of your spouse in a hospital.
Now all the previous I've mentioned is literally skimming the bare surface minimum on the subject matter but let me ask you this one more time however: What don't you understand about "the gays" (aka two people who are of sound mind willfully making that commitment to one another) wanting to get married again?

|

|
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/1/2014
Posts: 39,650
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Silence.
That's a standard response to the notion of gay adoption. Here is why it is faulty: - It is scientifically and sociologically disproven. Check Bridget Fitzgerald research and work regarding child development.The consensus of the study is that parent's sexual orientation has no effect on child development.
- There's also Gregory Herek's findings which also support those findings.
- A 25 on going study by UoC found that children of homosexual parents actually: "ere rated significantly higher in social, school/academic, and total competence and significantly lower in social problems, rule-breaking, aggressive, and externalizing problem behavior than their age-matched counterparts in Achenbach's normative sample of American youth"
- This is also supported by the University of Pittsburgh which found evidence to support that.
And this is just some of the evidence off the top of my head.
Now lets broaden the talk to discuss the notion of marriage in general. Why do gay people want to get married? - Lets start with the plain fact that a majority of homosexual people recognise themselves with the ideals of atheism or agnosticism. So by large that takes religion and "the recognition of their union by god" out of the equation.
- Going further and back to the notion of adoption. Civil partnerships and non-married individuals have a harder time when going through the adoption process. In fact many don't even get approval based on the fact that they are not married.
- Expanding it further. Here in the year 2014 it is sociologically observed that many individuals united in a romantic and/or sexual relationship do not actually have children. So taking it back to the notion that they're not getting married to just have a perfect nuclear family as it's slowly but surely becoming a more archaic modal in day to day life.
- How about the rights awarded to individuals who are married? Marriage officially (as in legally) indoctrinates people into the other's respective family. As such they receive benefits that a non married couple does not. Those benefits include taxes for example and allows them to merge their assets with one another. Also (and quite importantly) it awards the married individuals certain rights in regards to the health system. I'm sure you've heard about those things, like the power of attorney and hell even to visit and take care of your spouse in a hospital.
Now all the previous I've mentioned is literally skimming the bare surface minimum on the subject matter but let me ask you this one more time however: What don't you understand about "the gays" (aka two people who are of sound mind willfully making that commitment to one another) wanting to get married again?

|
Sis, clock it 
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/4/2012
Posts: 759
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Silence.
That's a standard response to the notion of gay adoption. Here is why it is faulty: - It is scientifically and sociologically disproven. Check Bridget Fitzgerald research and work regarding child development.The consensus of the study is that parent's sexual orientation has no effect on child development.
- There's also Gregory Herek's findings which also support those findings.
- A 25 on going study by UoC found that children of homosexual parents actually: "ere rated significantly higher in social, school/academic, and total competence and significantly lower in social problems, rule-breaking, aggressive, and externalizing problem behavior than their age-matched counterparts in Achenbach's normative sample of American youth"
- This is also supported by the University of Pittsburgh which found evidence to support that.
And this is just some of the evidence off the top of my head.
Now lets broaden the talk to discuss the notion of marriage in general. Why do gay people want to get married? - Lets start with the plain fact that a majority of homosexual people recognise themselves with the ideals of atheism or agnosticism. So by large that takes religion and "the recognition of their union by god" out of the equation.
- Going further and back to the notion of adoption. Civil partnerships and non-married individuals have a harder time when going through the adoption process. In fact many don't even get approval based on the fact that they are not married.
- Expanding it further. Here in the year 2014 it is sociologically observed that many individuals united in a romantic and/or sexual relationship do not actually have children. So taking it back to the notion that they're not getting married to just have a perfect nuclear family as it's slowly but surely becoming a more archaic modal in day to day life.
- How about the rights awarded to individuals who are married? Marriage officially (as in legally) indoctrinates people into the other's respective family. As such they receive benefits that a non married couple does not. Those benefits include taxes for example and allows them to merge their assets with one another. Also (and quite importantly) it awards the married individuals certain rights in regards to the health system. I'm sure you've heard about those things, like the power of attorney and hell even to visit and take care of your spouse in a hospital.
Now all the previous I've mentioned is literally skimming the bare surface minimum on the subject matter but let me ask you this one more time however: What don't you understand about "the gays" (aka two people who are of sound mind willfully making that commitment to one another) wanting to get married again?

|
Sis, f**k your facts I can make my own up and say that some random french professor-scientist agrees and bam I'll have gullible people eating out of the palms of my hands. Please, for Pete's sake, have a seat because arguing through a computer screen ain't gonna get you that hubby.
|
|
|
|
|
|