[gloamingtheplain]

Originally posted by H-I-M

Samsung keeps the same resolution as the S4, Apple stans will call it a S4 2.0
Samsung puts a 2K screen on it, Apple stans will call it useless (until Apple releases a 2K phone)

They can never win, can they ?

No matter what screen resolution, the S5 is nothing but an S4 2.0 unless Sammy innovate.
Specs aren't innovation. Hence why the iPhone 5C is just an iPhone 5 2.0. Just cheaper to make.

The S4 brought new idea's, no matter how useful, to the table.

Apple fans will call 2K on an iPhone useless unless there is a bigger screen. Just like they called the 5C useless.
On the iPad though? Extremely useful.

2k on a phone? When you won't be able to tell the difference on a 5" screen BUT the Samsung frontline tablet where you could notice the difference but it's still at Standard resolution still? Not very useful.

[H-I-M]

Originally posted by gloamingtheplain

My point is, when Samsung's latest frontline tablet has the same resolution as the iPad 1 from 2010, there is no use bragging about 2k on a 5" tablet (when you won't even notice the difference) when the tablet could used "high-res" at least.

But this is the Samsung Galaxy S5 thread, what Samsung does with his tablets is IRRELEVANT.


And why are you even talking about tablets that got introduced like 7 months ago, when Samsung just announced a 8 inch tablet with a "2560x1600" resolution ? That's clearly an indication on what they're going to do with the rest of their tablets from now on.
http://www.tomshardware.com/news/sam...iew,26108.html

[VyktorJonas]

Originally posted by TikiMiss

iPhones are the pits. Slow to innovate. Tiny screens for people with tiny hands.

+, having a macbook and iPad, I don't want everything in the same boring ecosystem. Doubletwist >> iTunes/iPod music player anyhow

I'm a hybrid stan too, I use OS X 10.9.1 on my ultrabook but for phones I've always loved Android more
OS X >> Windows
Android >> iOS

[Ribs]

The drags from gloamingtheplain

If samsung does more plastic phones I will cackle

[H-I-M]

Originally posted by gloamingtheplain

No matter what screen resolution, the S5 is nothing but an S4 2.0 unless Sammy innovate.
Specs aren't innovation. Hence why the iPhone 5C is just an iPhone 5 2.0. Just cheaper to make.

The S4 brought new idea's, no matter how useful, to the table.

Apple fans will call 2K useless unless there is a bigger screen. Just like they called the 5C useless.

The iPhone 5C has the exact same specs as the iPhone 5, hence the 2.0
But if Samsung releases a phone with
-Bigger screen, one of the first 2K screen on the market, better camera, better processor, fingerprint scanner (that Motorola did first by the way), I don't see why people would call it a S4 2.0.

I mean what else could Samsung do ? Give me an example of those "innovations" you're talking about.

[TikiMiss]

Originally posted by VyktorJonas

I'm a hybrid stan too, I use OS X 10.9.1 on my ultrabook but for phones I've always loved Android more
OS X >> Windows
Android >> iOS

Best of both Worlds tbh

[gloamingtheplain]

Originally posted by TikiMiss

iPhones are the pits. Slow to innovate. Tiny screens for people with tiny hands.

+, having a macbook and iPad, I don't want everything in the same boring ecosystem. Doubletwist >> iTunes/iPod music player anyhow

The 4" screen is the perfect size for the average human hand.

4.1" and above is actually bigger than the average human hand, and Apple sis is going to have to backtrack that iPhone slogan if the next phone is bigger than 4"

The tiny hand market goes to Samsung's 3" Smartphone range.

[TikiMiss]

Originally posted by gloamingtheplain

The 4" screen is the perfect size for the average human hand.

4.1" and above is actually bigger than the average human hand, and Apple sis is going to have to backtrack that iPhone slogan if the next phone is bigger than 4"

The tiny hand market goes to Samsung's 3" Smartphone range.

Steve Wozniak: 'The iPhone is Too Small'
more:
Wozniak also addressed the iPhone, which he says was just not big enough for his needs. He referenced Apple's major rival Samsung and its Galaxy S4 and Galaxy Note 3 smartphones as offering much bigger and better experiences on a smartphone, along with the HTC One.

[controversy]

but has the phone officially leaked yet?

[H-I-M]

Originally posted by TikiMiss

I also recall Steve Jobs himself saying that "3.5 inch is the perfect size to hold a phone with one hand"

Now it's 4.0 (funny how it became the perfect size right when Apple came with a 4 inch iPhone).

[TikiMiss]

Originally posted by H-I-M

I also recall Steve Jobs himself saying that "3.5 inch is the perfect size to hold a phone with one hand"

Now it's 4.0 (funny how it became the perfect size right when Apple came with a 4 inch iPhone).

kii. Even Apple's Founders would not/do not like the current iPhone

[gloamingtheplain]

Originally posted by H-I-M

The iPhone 5C has the exact same specs as the iPhone 5, hence the 2.0
But if Samsung releases a phone with
-Bigger screen, one of the first 2K screen on the market, better camera, better processor, fingerprint scanner (that Motorola did first by the way), I don't see why people would call it a S4 2.0.

I mean what else could Samsung do ? Give me an example of those "innovations" you're talking about.

The Bump feature, the hand gestures, smart scroll etc. are all innovations.
Having better specs is not innovation (which is standard). How is better specs "out of the box".

in·no·va·tion [in-uh-vey-shuhn] :noun
1.
something new or different introduced: numerous innovations in the high-school curriculum.
2.
the act of innovating; introduction of new things or methods.

"new" not "improved"

Motorola used a fingerprint sensor, not a fingerprint scanner.

Motorola used the basic fingerprint sensor used on everyday tech even back in the day.
Apple used a scanner that actually scans your fingerprint, as an image.

Motorola didn't do it "first".

[BlooRiverAnimal]

Kii @ this thread.

[VyktorJonas]

Originally posted by controversy

but has the phone officially leaked yet?

how does something "officially leaks"?

[Jameson Teqkilla]

Will they finally fix TouchWiz's lag problems????

[gloamingtheplain]

Originally posted by TikiMiss

Maybe he has big hands since it said, "for his needs".
The average human hand fits the 4" better. 4" isn't for tiny hands.

[H-I-M]

Originally posted by gloamingtheplain

The Bump feature, the hand gestures, smart scroll etc. are all innovations.
Having better specs is not innovation (which is standard). How is better specs "out of the box".



"new" not "improved"

Motorola used a fingerprint sensor, not a fingerprint scanner.

Motorola used the basic fingerprint sensor used on everyday tech even back in the day.
Apple used a scanner that actually scans your fingerprint, as an image.

Motorola didn't do it "first".

The first mainstream Ultra HD screen on a phone is innovation sis, at this point we might as well just agree to disagree.

[gloamingtheplain]

Originally posted by H-I-M

I also recall Steve Jobs himself saying that "3.5 inch is the perfect size to hold a phone with one hand"

Now it's 4.0 (funny how it became the perfect size right when Apple came with a 4 inch iPhone).

3.5" was perfect size to hold in one hand, according to Steve.
4" was actually proven as the biggest size, for one handed use, for the average human hand.

There was a difference.

[TikiMiss]

Originally posted by gloamingtheplain

Maybe he has big hands since it said, "for his needs".
The average human hand fits the 4" better. 4" isn't for tiny hands.

I'll be ready for the story change and new studies saying 4.5-inch is the best fit for average human hands when Apple comes out with iPhone 6

[VyktorJonas]

a friend of mine who's like 6 foot tall struggles to deal with his tiny screen, he hates it and wishes he had a bigger phone
while I'm 5'7" just chilling with my 5" smartphone