lol @ brtitney being the artist of the decade she was huge for some years then became a tabloid star until the last years of the decade when she became a singles artist (now she's neither). This not even touching upon the fact that she was always seen as a manufactured airhead, and now that she's a shell of her former self has practically ruined her legacy.
No, Beyonce was defo the top female of the 00s. time will be on her side
Britney was artist of 2000-2001. No one really cared about her music after that. It was always the tabloids
Not to mention it took her 9 years to score a second #1 hit. For people the emphasize single performance, it seems an odd claim to make. And that's not even getting her non-existent recurrent airplay.
Not to mention it took her 9 years score a second #1 hit. For people the emphasize single performance, it seems an odd claim to make. And that's not even getting her non-existent recurrent airplay.
Even then her singles performance for her #1's are HELLA embarassing. If she didn't have sales, they wouldn't have hit #1.
...Baby One More Time was #1 on Hot Single Sales, and #40 on Hot Airplay.
Womanizer was #1 on Hot Digital Songs, and #45 on Hot Airplay.
3 was #1 on Hot Digital Songs, #49 on Radio Songs.
Hold It Against Me was #1 on Hot Digital Songs, #23 on Radio Songs.
I don't use this Kworb made propaganda. Dangerously In Love at 8.5 when it's much closer to 10M. B'Day at 6M when it's at 7. Also, throw in BEYONCÉ (which has sold 10M by 1999 standards)
she was huge for some years then became a tabloid star until the last years of the decade when she became a singles artist (now she's neither). This not even touching upon the fact that she was always seen as a manufactured airhead, and now that she's a shell of her former self has practically ruined her legacy.
