[BlueTimberwolf]

Originally posted by Retro

At no point does he grind against a wall, in no way is male shirtlessness considered graphic or explicit, and in no way does his avatar focus solely upon the rear end of it's subject; in fact, his rear is not once focused upon. In contrast the other avatar is 90% made up of the woman's behind and features said behind being grabbed.

Are you really trying to argue that people are not sexually aroused by shirtless men?

And if this is the rule, that model should be allowed.

[Porygon2z]

I don't think that avatar with the guy is explicit. I see more like he just woke up and is concerned about something.

[FunkyDinevo]

Why are y'all so PRESSED over avatars. If the mods say it's okay then let that **** go.


and death @ this long-ass avi

[coolcristobal]

dd; @ this being brought up two months later.

[orlandoe]

Originally posted by FunkyDinevo

Why are y'all so PRESSED over avatars. If the mods say it's okay then let that **** go.


and death @ this long-ass avi

[Retro]

Originally posted by BlueTimberwolf

Are you really trying to argue that people are not sexually aroused by shirtless men?

And if this is the rule, that model should be allowed.

People are sexually aroused by feet of all things sometimes. What I'm arguing is that a shirtless male does NOT necessarily require intent to sexualize the image, whereas zooming in on a woman's behind and having her grab it DOES.

[posh]

Here, I made you an acceptable av ispit.

[Mimie]

Originally posted by Porygon2z

I don't think that avatar with the guy is explicit. I see more like he just woke up and is concerned about something.

!! Like, we can't wake up and look cute @ the same time now?

[BlueTimberwolf]

Originally posted by Borntodiethisway

Retro has already stated that the AVI isn't allowed, if you feel like he's treating you unfairly send a help request. Repeating the same thing over, and over isn't going to help your case.

I already sent a help request. Now I'm taking it to the people

[SupahBass05]

Originally posted by posh

Here, I made you an acceptable av ispit.

[Haunter]

Originally posted by FunkyDinevo

Why are y'all so PRESSED over avatars. If the mods say it's okay then let that **** go.


and death @ this long-ass avi

It's a short story.

[i spit on haters]

Originally posted by posh

Here, I made you an acceptable av ispit.

nkjl;' thanx.

[Penk]

Originally posted by i spit on haters

And if I'm not mistaken, that very same member sent me a friend req. the other day, which I denied.

The only reason I posted it here is because I posted it in the "best avis" thread, and a mod gave me a reminder and told me to tell them which user it was. It wasn't anything personal.

[BlueTimberwolf]

Originally posted by Retro

People are sexually aroused by feet of all things sometimes. What I'm arguing is that a shirtless male does NOT necessarily require intent to sexualize the image, whereas zooming in on a woman's behind and having her grab it DOES.

Zooming in on the dudes body in slow motion is OBVIOUSLY trying to sexualize him as well. That was the clear intent, what else would it be?

What is the difference between that and the blonde model?

[Staryu]

Originally posted by posh

Here, I made you an acceptable av ispit.

much better

[BlueTimberwolf]

There is obvious sexual intent in this avi as well

[Haunter]

I've gotten 5 points for an explicit AVI, so the mods def aren't being bias.

[i spit on haters]

Originally posted by Penk

The only reason I posted it here is because I posted it in the "best avis" thread, and a mod gave me a reminder and told me to tell them which user it was. It wasn't anything personal.

d

So you snitched? mess.

[orlandoe]

Originally posted by Borntodiethisway

I've gotten 5 points for an explicit AVI, so the mods def aren't being bias.

Wait...

[Retro]

Originally posted by BlueTimberwolf

Zooming in on the dudes body in slow motion is OBVIOUSLY trying to sexualize him as well. That was the clear intent, what else would it be?

What is the difference between that and the blonde model?

Male nudity and female nudity are different. That's society for you - it's not sexist of the moderating team to recognize this difference and we're not going to alter policy because of it, but feel free to take it up with society as a whole (and please nobody try to turn this into a moral debate or anything, because on principle I think the blonde lady avi is fine, but the reality is that it is not allowed). Borntodiethisway's avi is not in any way graphic or explicit enough to warrant removal; because of the different standards wider society places upon women regarding nudity, the blonde woman avatar is "graphic" enough to warrant removal. By the same token, due to societal standards that are entirely out of control of myself and the rest of the moderating team, ISOH's avatar has been deemed too suggestive to be appropriate for ATRL and BTDTW's has not. That is literally all the explanation and arguing I can give you.