Ok so let us SIT and DISCUSS.
Quote:
Category: Graphic
Details: It is explicit. It serves no other person than body exhibition. Too much skin is revealed in a sexualized manner. We have rules against it. Aren't you happy that it's been explained? Change it, now.
|
Let us review the avatar at large and the accusation by the moderator.
"It is explicit. It serves no other person than body exhibition." - You are mistaken. If you inspect the avi, you will see that it is mostly showing above the shoulder, with very few instances of leg and back, and no midriff. Now, rethink your claims. Is the avatar's sole purpose still to exhibit the body, even though there's BARELY any body to be SEEN?
"Too much skin is revealed in a sexualized manner." - If you read the above defense, you will learn that too much skin is NOT being revealed. Now, is the woman popping her *****? Is she bouncing her boobies? Is she droppin' it low? Is she rubbing her ****? No. She is merely playing with her hair and lying on a bed. This is not sexual unless you make it to be. She's just being cute.
Now please reconsider your decision and try to be reasonable and work things out instead of impulsively warning me.
Back to Banland you go!
Only me, a WP for abrasive without a single simple harsh word 