I want to make a thread asking members about their opinions
on one of ATRL's current rules but I'm not sure if it'd get closed
immediately. Asking about it in HQ isn't really the same.
I want to make a thread asking members about their opinions
on one of ATRL's current rules but I'm not sure if it'd get closed
immediately. Asking about it in HQ isn't really the same.
Curious:
Lee!! has said flamebait is flamebait, even if it's about your own fav. Got it.
You just said a nickname, even positive ones from stans, is a warnable nickname. Got it.
If that is the case, shouldn't this following post be warned as well? Circumventing the censor is warnable even if it's praise, is it not?
Curious:
Lee!! has said flamebait is flamebait, even if it's about your own fav. Got it.
You just said a nickname, even positive ones from stans, is a warnable nickname. Got it.
If that is the case, shouldn't this following post be warned as well? Circumventing the censor is warnable even if it's praise, is it not?
I'm so confused with my warnings this time around. This is abrasive?
...Vin
Do we really have to play this game though? Yes, it is. I'll note that when you bold things, tone transfers a little better, and tone has an affect on what is or is not perceived as abrasive.
I'm so confused with my warnings this time around. This is abrasive?
...Vin
Maybe because you "attacked" the monsters with the "every song, every artwork" statement.
By the way, that thread title is misleading. That should be fixed.
Can a moderator explain me how this post is a flamebait?
I honestly didn't know the girl OP was talking about, that's why I used that gif.
Can it be reversed? It wasn't intended, omg.
Can a moderator explain me how this post is a flamebait?
I honestly didn't know the girl OP was talking about, that's why I used that gif.
Can it be reversed? It wasn't intended, omg.
The second one will be kept. Use Google or something instead of going on about it again in the thread with a shady gif.
I will never understand why people enter on threads about someone/something they don't know just to say "Who?" or similar things. If they were really interested in those subjects they'd google them, other way, posting "Who?" or similar things is really shady.
the posts that used that gif are not warned ... can someone explain this
You evaded the censor by mangling a word, and the term you were mangling was still recognizable. Anything other than simply typing the word and letting the censor eliminate it is warnable.
someone should really do something about this thread http://atrl.net/forums/showthread.php?t=448983
the amount of blatant flamebait and trolling and just mean and angry comments is just
there are a bunch of comments that were left unwarned for pages and pages
I keep reporting them, but by the time 1 gets warned, 2 new pop up...
the insecurity in that thread
You evaded the censor by mangling a word, and the term you were mangling was still recognizable. Anything other than simply typing the word and letting the censor eliminate it is warnable.
okk thanks ... i didnt know that this is warnable, i saw many people "evading the censorship"
It seems the Katy stans might finally get their wish. Welp, it has been fun girls lol
