Well I guess that's all you need. The rest of the world could care less about the other crap. Gaga writing and helping produce her flops don't make them any better. They're still ****** failures.
So Bionic genre being similar to Fame could only mean that she was copying Gaga?
Christina said on 2007 that she was going for a futuristic sound opposite from Back To Basics. Bionic has nothing to do with Gaga other than having the same video director do very similar things.
too bad Gaga was futeristic first and xtine ended up copying
Well she is not Kate Bush but she is neither Ke$ha I think on that department. She must have some kind of saying after all these years of success.
Her success would lead her to get less of a say, not more. Her success didn't come because of her, it came because of her team. So her team gets more power with each release and she gets less. She has less creative control than Ke$ha, she just doesn't even have any creative drive so she doesn't fight back.
Who even gives a ****... She stays winning and she puts out better music than other pop artists. That's all that matters. Do you think people give a **** about whether she picked a lead single or not?
My question wasn't about the quality of her output or whether people *care* how involved she is. Saying she has an "ear for hits" implies she actually has that right of refusal role in the process.
I'll probably like AP better, though.
