Quote:
Originally posted by GeezusHaberdash
that might be because the invention & progression of the internet, social media & faster, readily available "breaking news" as the world becomes more developed and interconnected.
you expect press coverage to be as slow & less readily available in 2013 as it was in 1965?

|
Would anyone have cared to read that Princess Diana enjoyed Sprite and not Coke?

Or that she went to Walgreens instead of CVS?
I'm not saying people weren't obsessed, but clearly, people had some BRAINS not to CARE about celebrities and their boring daily habits as they did with Britters.