With his first arena tour ever and he's doing it with the lack of interest and hype that people claim he doesn't have.
Lol pull out all the receipts you want its not going to change the facts. If he didnt do that well I'd be shocked considering all of his music is tailor made for radio + radio candy for the
GP's sweet-tooth the point being , Bruno just doesnt have all the makings of being pop royalty. He is rarely discussed anywhere in pop culture.
His success is undeniable, as is his talent. However, he is rather basic. No one talks about him in real life and he has no cultural impact...therefore, no. The only time he made somewhat headlines is when he pretended to come out on April Fools
The fact that he's doing it without all the gimmicks & the media riding his dick pretending that the music was saved through him makes it even more impressive.
He does have star quality, but it isn't a very sparkling one. It's not like Britney Spears where no matter what people are interested in her. It's not his fault though that he didn't debut as a sexualized 16 year old and doesn't do controversial things though.
Okay, here's the deal. You can't give anyone legendary status or whatever that is if they're still kinda new to the industry, imo. It will take years for an artist to gain that legit legendary status. Give Bruno some time. Just like what I said, he's on the right track.
everybody knows bruno mars, y'all need to stop lying with this retarded delusion of what "impact" is
He's by no means unknown. But his impact is nowhere near that of Usher, JT, Justin Bieber, even Chris Brown... all who have more claims to the title of Prince of Pop.
I love Bruno with all my heart, but I don't like this royalty title tbh. It's overrated.
That's why I never use that term on him. I call him my king, but it's more like personal reference.
You guys here like to said this artist has impact, that artist has no impact, but that's not more than your opinion.
GP's opinion >>>>>>>> pop forum's opinion.
GP is the one who can validate this kind of title. Like how MJ's title as King of Pop and Elvis as King of Rock n' Roll stick to them, because GP agreed.
He's by no means unknown. But his impact is nowhere near that of Usher, JT, Justin Bieber, even Chris Brown... all who have more claims to the title of Prince of Pop.
usher is forgotten
the justins are local
and chris brown is just a mess in its own
He's by no means unknown. But his impact is nowhere near that of Usher, JT, Justin Bieber, even Chris Brown... all who have more claims to the title of Prince of Pop.
Wat? Are you saying Usher and Chris Brown are known worldwide as much as Bruno? No way!!! Usher and CB are know in the USA, they are not famous on other countries. Bruno, in other hand, is pretty known and his songs are pretty much played everywhere. Well, u tried.
Now we all know that the king of pop was and will always be Michael Jackson but what about the prince of pop. Rolling stone has given bruno the title of pop's golden child and critics always describe bruno as the love child between MJ
I think it's safe to start looking for a king...Michael's dead, you can't rule while you're dead, just like a regular monarchy, one dies and someone takes over. He's the God of Pop now...but the Kingdom of Pop is still without a King as I feel none of the current guys (even JT) are worthy enough to replace him
the point being , Bruno just doesnt have all the makings of being pop royalty. He is rarely discussed anywhere in pop culture.
