[i spit on haters]

I think she's a very smart business woman. It's a win-win situation, she gets her #1 and two lucky fans get to meet their favorite pop star. Everyone is happy in the end.

[DitaBoy12]

WOW poor thing!! Even if she eventually gets that #1 that tweet just makes her look desperate and kinda sad.

[H2o]

Originally posted by alfonso12

Not a fan of someone who discounted singles at 0.69, and released an acoustic version and remixes with Kanye West, Missy Elliot and B.o.B talking about being thirsty for a #1.

& yes she is but considering the rush release it's understandable...

Originally posted by kleinemonster

Not when AMAZON paid full price for those albums then sold them for 99 cents.

Exactly.

[slobro]

Originally posted by Katy V.!

Not when your fave sold her album at $.99 during its release week

Not when it would've debuted at #1 with or without the discount
Not when the girl in your avi copied that exact same deal a year later for her re-release

[dannylex]

She wouldn't have made those tweets if the song would have rushed to #1, that's for sure.

[Sloth]

It's a marketing strategy to compensate for the rush release. Y'all are just mad because she can pull this off in her favor. It's not like Katy perry or any other pop star can do this with any noticeable benefits for their charting performance.

[Beatz]

The desperation.

[memi stan]

Wow. She's going to make her fans go broke .

[RomanNavy]

All those tweets
It's getting embarrassing

[Roberto]

I don't know. I just know that I didn't like Applause but Brave, sorry Roar is even worst.

[xxtinaxx]

Lmfao. She's smart this time, though since there is no discount involved.

[jqnetto]

Embarrassing.

[NEZ]

Damn give this bitch some water, because she's definetly thirstyyyy.

[Nikko]

She really wants the #1 and she's doing as much as possible to get it.
I'd do it to if I was forced to rush-release my single.

[SillyBandz]

it's not a good look imo but hustle bitch

[alfonso12]

Originally posted by Squall

Btw, if you want to know, E.T. feat. Kanye was the single version, not a remix to get the #1 (she would have got it without Kanye anyway).

Kanye's version is a remix of the original version the fact that it was released earlier doesn't means that it's not a remix

Originally posted by Katy V.!

Not when your fave sold her album at $.99 during its release week

Amazon did that, not Gaga, she got her 8 dollars per digital album in the other hand, Katy was the one that needed that discount. Not to mention that TD:TCC was also sold at $.99 at Amazon tho.

Oh! and it would have debuted at #1 with higher first week sales than TD+OOTB together anyway.

[Mike91]

MESS.

[Squall]

Originally posted by alfonso12

Kanye's version is a remix of the original version the fact that it was released earlier doesn't means that it's not a remix



Amazon did that, not Gaga, she got her 8 dollars per digital album in the other hand, Katy was the one that needed that discount. Not to mention that TD:TCC was also sold at $.99 at Amazon tho.

Oh! and it would have debuted at #1 with higher first week sales than TD+OOTB together anyway.

So? Still not the same thing, the remix had not been released to get the #1 (you know what I mean when I say that).

I remember E.T. broke a record on Pop radios and you perfectly know it's not thanks to Kanye.

The Kanye version had been removed from iTunes and the album version climbed fast reaching the #2 position on iTunes (if I remember right).

What does it mean? It means that Kanye or not, the song would've smashed and got that #1.

[-Alfie-]

Let me go buy Katy's single

[HumanitySector]

I'm completely done with this bitch. General public has no interest in song or her, so she tries to EXPLOIT her own fanbase.

QUEEN OF THE UNIVERSE oh my god. She's so bland, trying to suck up to Katy and her fans and tweeting these embarassing tweets. Bye Gaga, you're done.