but to be honest I bet she secretly learned her lesson. The GP (which she needs hard this time) wasn't here for "Born Looking Bad" Gaga.
is apparently flamebait...
I did NOT say "Ugly" on purpose but phrased it "looking bad" like the monster in the OP who of course was nto warned in this thread called "Will ARTPOP be Gaga's prettiest era?" so expect people to talk about bad looking or not
The monsters even used the word "ugly" I did not.
Quote:
Originally posted by Jack!
So, many Gaga fans complain about her bad looks throughout the Born This Way era, and a lot of people think her over-tanned fake look in The Fame/Monster wasn't too good looking either. With her latest looks and new promo shot, do you think ARTPOP will be her best looking era?
Quote:
Originally posted by Jack!
I agree, but I'm talking about the people who thought she looked ugly in the Born This Way era.
Is telling the truth also worthy of warning points now?
If i take you back to Matthew chapter 19, verse 18, it clearly states "Thou shalt not lie in giving evidence". You cannot deny a man (or woman) the right to give their honest opinion on a subject matter. If this is the general perception of this one "Lady GaGa", the general consensus should be adhered to.
No. Only the moderator who warned you is able to undue a warning. Other moderators can bring it up to said moderator, but only he/she can undo what he or she has done (if they so choose too.)
Oh well thanks for explaining that. Can you explain to me how my post is trolling though? I've explained my thoughts on the previous page and if my post is warranted for a warning I don't think Trolling is the best categorization for it. It was just my opinion on Lady Gaga's impact on pop music just like how it was MTV's opinion on it as well. Anyways thank you for reviewing my question whenever you can.
warning
