They are glorified bottom feeders that get told how to be.
I swear they praise her whenever it's appropriate and go the other direction whenever.
They don't have minds of their own.
Let's call them glorified ATRL anti Britney posters.
As much as I don't like the media picking on her, I want more controversy for the next era.
FF era felt like it went unnoticed. No one really had anything say about it.
Controversy is what Britney's always been about. I want her to do something that will spark discussions whether it's her songs, videos, performances, outfits or whatever.
Yay! When will the other girl?
--
He said that he rather eat his own **** than listening too S&S, lol can't wait to see his pics when he eats his own ****!
There is actually A LOT of controversy over the airbrush thing. But I'm glad about it, though, because it will sell the magazine through word of mouth and prove to the lessors that Britney can still get people riled up!
If you are a fat pig housewife posting here while your meal ticket is earning your keep then you are going to imagine all sort of alterations from these shots. JEALOUS and ready to trash anyone who has put limits on diet and excercise - as YOU should have. The fact remains, one is a candid shot and blurry and one is a cover shot and clear. That, in and of itself, is a reason no genuine comparison should be attempted. If you are a model or prof photog, you can see that this cover is barely touched. It's accurate as it stands. I have to shake my head at all of these mavins here that think they imagine otherwise.
Mary Petersen better not try it with Lola
