i mean it's BEYONCE. It's not hard to believe.
I mean, there was a thread yesterday about people hating her for uploading pics to HER tumblr and HER instagram.
But I thought they wanted her to be more "open", "relatable", "real" and blah blah and stuff?
But I thought they wanted her to be more "open", "relatable", "real" and blah blah and stuff?
Everytime she gives us what we ask for, the lessors naturally gag & all they can come up with is she's "fake", "boring", "not relatable", & "too private".
Everytime she gives us what we ask for, the lessors naturally gag & all they can come up with is she's "fake", "boring", "not relatable", & "too private".
They bitched for years about her not being on twitter/Tumblr etc, and now she gets on them and they're bitching that she needs to get off. IDGI.
if a picture annoys you so much then don't look at it
Britney, Xtina, JLO, etc. still dress sexy. But its a problem with Beyonce does it?
You know EVERYTHING is a problem when it comes to Beyoncé. Everything.
Quote:
Originally posted by Nicole
She looks great, she did sexy before Rihanna existed, she did ratchet before Rihanna and that word existed (she just called it bootylicious), there's really nothing to shade here. It's just a magazine cover - it's OK to admit defeat and move on.
Jump on me for being pressed (I'm sure that's the default plan here) but there is not an ounce of "class" about this. And that's not even necessarily a bad thing. Using sex to sell is no black mark to me.
But the hive can't have it both ways. You can't do shoots like this as a mother and then pretend Bey is a walking beacon of "classy" and condemn others for their dirty image.
This attitude is quite hypocritical. Y'all praise now but it will come back to haunt.
Anyway, it's hot so, good cover
Ch bye, Mothers can be sexy and sexy doesn't equal dirty.
