Perhaps a perhaps a person who stans for an artists that needs Daddy's signature to buy the groceries?
what kind of SYG tea?
You do realize its not like that right?
And seriously why would you even bring up something as personal as this. Wasn't the point of this thread to talk about Brit & Bey Stan's not Brits personal life, beys Grammys, or sales receipts. In which you brought all 3 up.
Britney was a white teenage superstar, what did you expect? Even I was a fan back in the days, when she was the cute virgin.
So was Jessica Simpson, Mandy Moore and tons of other artists. Very few reached Britney's success. VERY FEW. You can blame color and genre all you want.
This returned Bey vs Brit mess.Britney sold more,Bey has more talent.Both are iconic living legends,whatever you say. Brit is the reason of Gaga,Bey is for Rihanna.#END
So was Jessica Simpson, Mandy Moore and tons of other artists. Very few reached Britney's success. VERY FEW. You can blame color and genre all you want.
plus BOMT era alone didn't sell 100 million records most of records were sold after her "teenage virgin" era.
And seriously why would you even bring up something as personal as this. Wasn't the point of this thread to talk about Brit & Bey Stan's not Brits personal life, beys Grammys, or sales receipts. In which you brought all 3 up.
Accusing my fav of buying her grammys of which there is not as much of an article to back it up and accused of stealing songwriting credits all of which she was cleared of. FYI, i did not introduce grammys into this thread, Mister Martian did
This returned Bey vs Brit mess.Britney sold more,Bey has more talent.Both are iconic living legends,whatever you say. Brit is the reason of Gaga,Bey is for Rihanna.#END
Beyonce is a better singer, Britney is a better dancer. Britney plays an instrument, Beyonce does not. Britney writes melodies, Beyonce does not. How does that make Beyonce more talented?
They are even IMO. Pop music is as muc about dancing as about singing. There is no point in this comparison. People used to say that Madonna had no talent back in the day, look at her now?
I don't complicate it. For me success is how many people actually went and spent their money on your record. Not what few so called 'critics' think about your music.
Accusing my fav of buying her grammys of which there is not as much of an article to back it up and accused of stealing songwriting credits all of which she was cleared of. FYI, i did not introduce grammys into this thread, Mister Martian did
I never brought up stealing song writing credit or her dad buying Grammys, I never even mentioned either.
Those two would have never been brought up if you didn't bring the sales in this anyway.
Beyonce is a better singer, Britney is a better dancer. Britney plays an instrument, Beyonce does not. Britney writes melodies, Beyonce does not. How does that make Beyonce more talented?
So was Jessica Simpson, Mandy Moore and tons of other artists. Very few reached Britney's success. VERY FEW. You can blame color and genre all you want.
No one has reachedher success since then.No one has sold 45 million albums WW only with 2 albums!
And please don't say that you can't sell that much nowadays,Adele proved that you can have 20mill seller in 2011 and 2012.
all cards are still on the table boo, if u want the masquerade to stop dancing, stop the music
Me, a hypocrite? I take offence to that insurmountable levy of lie sir. I would never
P.S. I love Britney, she's a sweet woman
Then I don't see how you can be mad at my example of Grammy's. I mean, you argument is completely logical and understandable. It's just not fact based. I base everything I've stated completely off of facts. Numbers. Certifications. I don't choose specific time frames. I give you the same numbers that the RIAA, Billboard or any other respected publication or statistic source would. That does not include places like the Grammy's who are by all means more respected by places like the VMAs, but are just as biased and unrealistic.
The seething here is heavenly.