Their judging you on your "Loud has no fillers" comment.
It was obviously seen as nearly flawless by the committee as well as the GP, but Adele's 21 was seen as even more flawless and deservingly won. All of the albums nominated were good though.
What are the Britney stans even trying to say? It's just the same rambling about Grammys every post.
IKR? You mention that Rihanna got a Grammy nom for Album of the Year and they try to say how Grammys don't matter, etc. and how Rihanna has most of her's as a featured act when I didn't even mention Rihanna's wins, just the AOTY nom.
It was obviously seen as nearly flawless by the committee as well as the GP, but Adele's 21 was seen as even more flawless and deservingly won. All of the albums nominated were good though.
The biggest shock is Blackout's Metacritic score. For the longest time I thought that album was critically acclaimed. At least that is what the Britney stans told me. Guess they lied.
You were a Britney stan, I won't forget it so stop acting as if you had not been so..
It had no filler. Every song was single-worthy. Britney's singles were never really successful up until Femme Fatale, but then the album underperformed. How about that? Does that answer the question?
