| |
Fan Base: Archived: Britney Spears (#1)
Member Since: 3/26/2012
Posts: 2,927
|
Quote:
Originally posted by dinorel
I don't know, Forbes didn't breakdown Brit's 58M ... but in the description they said the money comes from her platinum album Femme Fatale, singles and mostly her tour.
Besides I think Britney was the excecutive producer of "The Femme Fatale tour" that could explain why she earned a big amount from it.
The Circus era was more lucrative though .... She earned $34M in 2009 and $64M in 2010, making $98M almost $100M just with the Circus era.  |
that explains why the tour was so cheap compared with some other pop girls tour at that time
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 6/9/2012
Posts: 11,144
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Underworld
that explains why the tour was so cheap compared with some other pop girls tour at that time
|
Drag!
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 10/8/2011
Posts: 7,309
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Underworld
that explains why the tour was so cheap compared with some other pop girls tour at that time]
|
 what? . . . are you shading Britney?
what do you mean with cheap? .. do you mean cheap tickets prices? , or are you calling "the FFT" a cheap tour? 
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 11/6/2010
Posts: 27,791
|
The Circus era was done by the end of 2009.
I wouldn't call 2010 part of the Circus era at all.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/26/2012
Posts: 2,927
|
Quote:
Originally posted by dinorel
what? . . . are you shading Britney?
what do you mean with cheap? .. do you mean cheap tickets prices? , or are you calling "the FFT" a cheap tour? |
Well it was a cheap tour, production from Circus is much better, with no catwalk the stage was sooo cheap and production is not really a big deal, not for someone who name is Britney Spears
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 10/8/2011
Posts: 7,309
|
Quote:
Originally posted by CaptainMusic
The Circus era was done by the end of 2009.
I wouldn't call 2010 part of the Circus era at all.
|
The 2010 issue of forbes is from june 2009 to june 2010.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 10/8/2011
Posts: 7,309
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Underworld
Well it was a cheap tour, production from Circus is much better, with no catwalk the stage was sooo cheap and production is not really a big deal, not for someone who name is Britney Spears
|
Just because the production wasn't as big as the Circus tour that automatically means the FFT is a cheap tour 
Actually the FFT could be Britney's second biggest tour in terms of production and stage .... is definately more expensive than the Onyx hotel tour and her first two tours.
Do ya think those screens are cheap? , sorry sista , but The stage and visuals of the Femme Fatale tour was one of the few highlights of the tour.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/26/2012
Posts: 2,927
|
Quote:
Originally posted by dinorel
Just because the production wasn't as big as the Circus tour that automatically means the FFT is a cheap tour
Actually the FFT could be Britney's second biggest tour in terms of production and stage .... is definately more expensive than the Onyx hotel tour and her first two tours.
Do ya think those screens are cheap? , sorry sista , but The stage and visuals of the Femme Fatale tour was one of the few highlights of the tour.
|
i Disagree, i think Onyx tour was more expensive then FFT.
I love FFT, but i think for somone like Britney Spears the stage was a crap.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 5/18/2012
Posts: 20,576
|
This was Britney's cheapest tour.
Her previous big three tours had bigger production, they were an event.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/26/2012
Posts: 2,927
|
Quote:
Originally posted by CoolestPerson12
This was Britney's cheapest tour.
Her previous big three tours had bigger production, they were an event.
|
Thank you.
Case closed
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 10/8/2011
Posts: 7,309
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Underworld
i Disagree, i think Onyx tour was more expensive then FFT.
I love FFT, but i think for somone like Britney Spears the stage was a crap.
|
Nop... Onyx tour was cheaper, small stage, low quality cheap interludes, very simple tour.
FFT was way more expensive it was a bigger production than the Onyx tour for sure.
But if you think the FFT stage was a crap thats only your opinion sweetie ...... actually the stage was one of the few things of the tour that received positive reviews by critics.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 10/8/2011
Posts: 7,309
|
Quote:
Originally posted by CoolestPerson12
This was Britney's cheapest tour.
Her previous big three tours had bigger production, they were an event.
|
It wasn't Britney's cheapest tour
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 7/21/2007
Posts: 17,522
|
Quote:
Originally posted by dinorel
Nop... Onyx tour was cheaper, small stage, low quality cheap interludes, very simple tour.
FFT was way more expensive it was a bigger production than the Onyx tour for sure.
But if you think the FFT stage was a crap thats only your opinion sweetie ...... actually the stage was one of the few things of the tour that received positive reviews by critics. |
sweetie no
Femme Fatale was her smallest scale tour since her debut tour
it was tiny compared to Circus and DWAD
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/6/2003
Posts: 50,977
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Duca
Eight studio releases, I guess?  |
Didn't she re-sign after "Britney"? That would automatically not make it a 8 studio albums contract... I'm not sure, though. 
Quote:
Originally posted by ToMmY
I could be here for B In The Mix: Part III if that means the next studio album gets released under another label. 
|
I thought this **** was supposed to end her contract. 
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/26/2012
Posts: 2,927
|
Quote:
Originally posted by dinorel
Nop... Onyx tour was cheaper, small stage, low quality cheap interludes, very simple tour.
FFT was way more expensive it was a bigger production than the Onyx tour for sure.
But if you think the FFT stage was a crap thats only your opinion sweetie ...... actually the stage was one of the few things of the tour that received positive reviews by critics. |
For that time Onyx tour was not cheap, maybe it looks that way now when production and lights is much better, but in 2004 definitly not.
But its ok sweete we all have our opinions, for me FFT stage was cheap compared with Rihanna stage.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 10/8/2011
Posts: 7,309
|
Quote:
Originally posted by RainMan
sweetie no
Femme Fatale was her smallest scale tour since her debut tour
it was tiny compared to Circus and DWAD
|
I'm just talking about production and stage design ... thats it.
1. Circus
2. DWAD
3. Femme Fatale
the other ones are cheap.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/6/2003
Posts: 50,977
|
Quote:
Originally posted by RainMan
sweetie no
Femme Fatale was her smallest scale tour since her debut tour
it was tiny compared to Circus and DWAD
|
The Onyx Tour was not that much elaborated either. 
The problem is, DWAD and TCSBS are too epic, so we are always expecting something outta this world when it comes to her tours. Maybe the next one? 
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 7/21/2007
Posts: 17,522
|
in terms of scale, production, stage:
DWAD
Circus
Onyx Hotel
OIDIA
Femme Fatale
BOMT
Ciaras parking lot tour
M&Ms tour
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/6/2003
Posts: 50,977
|
Quote:
Originally posted by RainMan
in terms of scale, production, stage:
DWAD
Circus
Onyx Hotel
Femme Fatale
BOMT
|
Aren't you forgetting something?
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 10/8/2011
Posts: 7,309
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Underworld
For that time Onyx tour was not cheap, maybe it looks that way now when production and lights is much better, but in 2004 definitly not.
But its ok sweete we all have our opinions, for me FFT stage was cheap compared with Rihanna stage.
|
Rihanna is irrelevant here, I don't care about her .... in Britney's career the FFT is not her cheapest one.
Anyway ... I really don't care if you think the stage was cheap or not ... this discussion should end because we are going on circles.
What I found really disgusting was you saying the tour was cheap because Britney Spears was involved in it , that was nasty. . .
|
|
|
|
|
|
