[Georges]

Originally posted by Phoenetic

I see how many Samsung phones are very similar to iPhones, more so than many other smartphones like HTC.
But this is just ridiculous. 1 billion? Really?
That's over the top...

Actually, most of these are just one phone under different names for various careers.

[Poe Dameron]

[QUOTE=jj99;11280913] Death... Steve Popping the Champagne in his Grave.

[jj99]

Originally posted by Georges

They aren't allowed to patent app store because it's like patenting supermarket. And this **** ain't piggybacking, mobile apps are in and there are only a couple terms that define software that sells it. That's anal and unclassy.

There was nothing like it though when apple opened their store. so its not like they stole a already popular term.

RIM seem to have dealt with it with their app world and android with the play store (android market)

[2AM]

Go Apple!

[Georges]

Originally posted by jj99

There was nothing like it though when apple opened their store. so its not like they stole a already popular term.

RIM seem to have dealt with it with their app world and android with the play store (android market)

Windows did too with the marketplace.

Let's hope that no anal company is gonna trademark another of these few terms.

[RastaMentality]

5:00:53 PM PDT
The court is back in recess until we hear from the jurors. Apple attorney Michael Jacobs said he was going to stay in the courtroom. "I wouldn't go far," Koh says.

4:59:36 PM PDT
Michael Jacobs shoots right up, cutting her off: "No your honor."

4:59:25 PM PDT
Koh asks if the parties would rather the jury show up on Monday to settle this instead.

4:56:53 PM PDT
Galaxy Tab 10.1 4G LTE. "It was accused of infringing the design patent 889 and there was an allegation of inducement of infringement... and there was also a claim of iPad and iPad 2 trade dress infringement."

Intercept: "The jury found no direct infringement but did find inducement" for the '915 and '163 utility patents. If a device didn't infringe, it would be rather hard for a company to induce said non-existant infringement.

4:56:13 PM PDT
"There are two inconsistencies we'd like to bring to your attention."

[fabbriche]

Originally posted by fabian_phipps

Queen Fenty disagrees.
Rih WW>Samsung WW.

Samsung sells 29 million expensive Samsung Galaxy S III in just a month or two. Rihanna hasn't sold those amount of albums for cheap yet in her entire career.

[jongshic]

Originally posted by fabbriche

Samsung sells 29 million expensive Samsung Galaxy S III in just a month or two. Rihanna hasn't sold those amount of albums for cheap yet in her entire career.

[Brite Lites ☆]

Holy ****
Let's hope Samsung doesn't go bankrupt.

Originally posted by fabbriche

Samsung sells 29 million expensive Samsung Galaxy S III in just a month or two. Rihanna hasn't sold those amount of albums for cheap yet in her entire career.

[Deuces]

Originally posted by fabbriche

Samsung sells 29 million expensive Samsung Galaxy S III in just a month or two. Rihanna hasn't sold those amount of albums for cheap yet in her entire career.

Well then.

[vuelve88]

Samsung got banged.

[H-I-M]

Originally posted by fabbriche

Samsung sells 29 million expensive Samsung Galaxy S III in just a month or two. Rihanna hasn't sold those amount of albums for cheap yet in her entire career.

Oops

[MrDeeds]

Damn, 1 b? I guess Samsung is going to be able to keep selling their stuff?

[manwhore]

This makes me despise apple even more now. Repulsive.now what..? Go after HTC and all the small vendors that use rectangle touch screens? They've gotten too big and stingy... now they want to monopolize tech and go after the other tech Co. that improve upon their ideas. (which aren't even their ideas to begin with)

[ICEMANatGT]

yup! of course the US will protect its homegrown brand & products...

[RastaMentality]

S. Korean court rules that Samsung and Apple infringed on each other’s patents http://t.co/Vat8Y97J

"A Seoul court ruled Friday that Apple infringed on two of Samsung’s technology patents and “must stop selling the infringing products in South Korea.” In addition, the judge said Samsung infringed on Apple’s “bounceback” design patent but not its icon design patent. These only apply to older model Apple products (perhaps pre-Qualcomm, now Apple is indemnified?), from the sound of it,*and the damages are in the tens of thousands of dollars, which is meaningless."

Breaking: A South Korean court has ruled that Apple infringed two Samsung Electronics technology patents. on.wsj.com/QONwDO
23 Aug 12

@BloombergTVWrld
Breaking News: A court in Seoul says Apple infringed some @samsung patents.
23 Aug 12

@BloombergTVWrld
The Seoul court also said that @samsung infringed some of Apple's patents
23 Aug 12

@BloombergTVWrld
Breaking News: @samsung didn't copy Apple's iPhone Design according to a Seoul court.
23 Aug 12

Evan Ramstad@EvanRamstad
Judges slap damages on both Apple and Samsung, but only in 10s of thousands of $. Halt sales of infringing products. #Apple #Samsung
23 Aug 12

[thegmangrant]

Apple


People say Android is better, yet it can't go without copying the almighty Apple

[DG1]

1 Billion

But still Galaxy>>>iPhone.

That judge must be a iPhone user

[DG1]

So what does it mean for Samsung phones going forward?

[Deuces]

Cupertino vs Seoul