I'd also like anyone who's joining in on this inane and unprovoked bout of bitching/cyberbullying to also be warned. Jesus, I didn't know my avatar got that many people pressed
Kworb, I never did thank you for the good discussion in the Frank Ocean thread. If only more
ATRL members would learn that when you disagree with someone, have a discussion
and let them know why you disagree, instead of becoming unnecessarily emotional
and hostile like members were beginning to do in that thread. It's far more
interesting to have a civil conversation than to be upset over an opinion.
I'm not sure why he is so pressed, but he's blocked me from viewing it. Thanks.
The blog is not that bad.
Quote:
Originally posted by Vin
Kworb, I never did thank you for the good discussion in the Frank Ocean thread. If only more
ATRL members would learn that when you disagree with someone, have a discussion
and let them know why you disagree, instead of becoming unnecessarily emotional
and hostile like members were beginning to do in that thread. It's far more
interesting to have a civil conversation than to be upset over an opinion.
...Vin
But it wouldn't be ATRL if people didn't get emotional and hostile.
Shortjohn9898??
Posted Yesterday at 12:37 AM by JonnyϟLightning
Everybody knows him, he is the filth America tries to clean off the streets.
The Grindr hook up you contact last minute when your date doesnt put out.
The guy whose booty hole is wider than one of the moon's craters. That guy.
Recently I was shown stills from one of his filthy web shows, and I was STUNNED.
But for all the wrong reasons. First of all, he's ugly. He looks like the unabomber, but uglier.
Secondly, where are the abs? they are nowhere to be seen in his live shows.
And then the ****. The ****, the ****, the ****. *sticks out pinky and laughs*
The mass bumping was trolling and a disturbance, that's why they got warned.
So do you actually think the blog "is not that bad" (when it very clearly is) or were you just saying that because you assumed I was unaware of its contents, thereby making it easier for you to justify not warning it?
So do you actually think the blog "is not that bad" (when it very clearly is) or were you just saying that because you assumed I was unaware of its contents, thereby making it easier for you to justify not warning it?
No it's really not that bad. It's not like he posted your pics.
No it's really not that bad. It's not like he posted your pics.
Fair enough.
So, in blogs, I can spew as much flamebait and ******** as I possibly can about another member, egg on others' cyberbullying, and post fake pictures of them and not get any warning points?
Or do we have to wait for the next movie?
