[TheVoiceXtina]

Originally posted by Igrt

Oh,God.

Now you see the problem facing us.

...#STM2012

[Kool_Aid_King]

The mods ain't even that bad

[TheVoiceXtina]

4 days till my baby Harry is unbanned. Who was the one who snitched?

...#STM2012

[Rentboy]

Having just logged on and checked out NHB can I suggest yet another thread being created called "Mock NHB"? Where members can have these playfights that seem to be very popular here.

[KitKat]

Originally posted by TheVoiceXtina

4 days till my baby Harry is unbanned. Who was the one who snitched?

...#STM2012

He needs to be thankful he's even allowed back from having a dupe. I told him if he's gonna come back just to start trouble then he won't be coming back at all. It was his own fault for making a second account.

Originally posted by Rentboy

Having just logged on and checked out NHB can I suggest yet another thread being created called "Mock NHB"? Where members can have these playfights that seem to be very popular here.

Nah, it's easier to just permanently thread ban them.

[SLAYANNA NAVY]

SLAYANNA NAVY:

You are receiving this message because the ATRL moderators were concerned with your recent activity.

Category: Nicknames
Details:

This warning will associate 1 point(s) with your account. Members are banned for one month upon accumulating 10 points, and they are banned permanently upon accumulating 20 points.

Note: These points might expire in the future. You can look up your current total number of warning points by viewing your profile. Click on your user name at the top of any page, and then select the Warnings tab.

Your original post, below, was the cause for concern. Please follow our community guidelines and do not continue to submit posts like the one below. Here is your post, for reference:


Quote:
Another album already? Yasss Beysus

Now I need to know who reported me and who accepted the warning point for this foolishness. I know nicknames are report worthy but I weren't even shading her like what the hell

[cheers09]

Notice about your recent activity on ATRL
cheers09:

You are receiving this message because the ATRL moderators were concerned with your recent activity.

Category: Flamebait
Details:

This warning will associate 1 point(s) with your account. Members are banned for one month upon accumulating 10 points, and they are banned permanently upon accumulating 20 points.

Note: These points might expire in the future. You can look up your current total number of warning points by viewing your profile. Click on your user name at the top of any page, and then select the Warnings tab.

Your original post, below, was the cause for concern. Please follow our community guidelines and do not continue to submit posts like the one below. Here is your post, for reference:

http://atrl.net/forums/showthread.php?p=10499489

Quote:
Katy Perry. she clearly sucked Dr. luke's dick to get those hits

i was clearly being sarcastic?! its clear that im a katy stan and i got reported for this? wtf is this sorcery?!

[cheers09]

and i also want to know who reported and accepted the warning point here. because i was just clearly using a gif as a reaction to a really funny post that, that one pitbull stan made and its already off topic? damn.

[Nathan's Nicely]

Dickard got banned???

[Legend ReX]

Originally posted by boyonce

Yes, do tell.

http://atrl.net/forums/showthread.ph...0#post10412090

http://atrl.net/forums/showthread.ph...3#post10490653

http://atrl.net/forums/showthread.ph...3#post10491573

Congratulations, you have made it onto my list.

[TheVoiceXtina]

Originally posted by SLAYANNA NAVY

Now I need to know who reported me and who accepted the warning point for this foolishness. I know nicknames are report worthy but I weren't even shading her like what the hell

Still a nickname, Still a Warning. The mods cant let favoritism be shown can they? That would mean their job wouldn't be conducted to an equal and fair footing?


...#STM2012

[Porygon2z]

What's that #STM2012 ?

[Matty]

Originally posted by Porygon2z

What's that #STM2012 ?

Something about us mods... Im not so sure

[orange]

Too many of these warning refutes have a generic response:
Nicknames are not allowed, no matter how you were or were not shading.
If I say Obamasus = nickname. If I say HackObama = nickname.
You see, intent does not matter. Nicknames are nicknames.

If you have gotten a Pointless warning, it is because your post was seen having no point.
This means that despite your intent, someone thought you were annoying by not contributing.
If you have nothing to say about topic and are just using a graphic, you are more likely to get that warning.
In fact, if you read the warning, it says Pointless can be given out when just a GIF is used.

Also, let me remind you:

Originally posted by Terms of Use

By using this site, you agree that you will not post any messages that are excessively annoying, obscene, hateful, inappropriate, sexually explicit, containing nudity, threatening to other members, or in violation of any laws. In addition to these general guidelines, more specific rules may be listed within individual sections of ATRL, and you must adhere to those rules as well. The ability to post messages at ATRL is a privilege, not a right. Members who consistently abuse this privilege by ignoring these rules will be warned or banned from posting. Our moderators will subjectively decide if these rules have been violated, and our administrators will make all final decisions.

[Heisenberg]

Originally posted by Muggwa

Can one be warned for responding to a thread/image/quote with just a smiley?

I think that the countless obnoxious smilies that always follow
obvious flamebait should be warned, especially if what they quoted was already warned




I guess I just hate how overused/misused that smiley is though

[orange]

Originally posted by Muggwa

Can one be warned for responding to a thread/image/quote with just a smiley?

I don't know about the other mods but I think it depends on what that smiley quotes. I personally am more likely to warn if it is quoting something that should not be quoted again, such as someone getting reported or warned, or someone posting a flamebait or offensive post. It can also be flamebait in itself just because of what was quoted and how the person reacted. Either way, I personally think smiley-only posts are pretty pointless too.

[Lee!!]

Originally posted by Muggwa

Okay, what if the smiley is used to indicate something that could otherwise be expressed in words. For example...


Me:



Me:



Me:

...Could those get warned? I feel like there's a lot of room for error with this rule.

For me it falls under the same heading as pointless. It's the same thing as a gif. Its not hard to use words.

[WIG-SNATCHER]

Notice about your recent activity on ATRL
WIG-SNATCHER:

You are receiving this message because the ATRL moderators were concerned with your recent activity.

Category: Trolling
Details:

This warning will associate 2 point(s) with your account. Members are banned for one month upon accumulating 10 points, and they are banned permanently upon accumulating 20 points.

Note: These points might expire in the future. You can look up your current total number of warning points by viewing your profile. Click on your user name at the top of any page, and then select the Warnings tab.

Your original post, below, was the cause for concern. Please follow our community guidelines and do not continue to submit posts like the one below. Here is your post, for reference:

http://atrl.net/forums/showthread.php?p=10507689
Quote:
Can we get to the bottom of this ATRL sisters? Why do the Beliebers and Monsters get the most mess of any other fan base? I have a few theories.......

1. It is fun to hate our fav
I have noticed that in most threads on ATRl, Youtube comment sections, and even out in public, people are ready to drag our fav to the pits for no good reason. Many times it is fun and not serious, but many times it is also hate and ignorant comments. Not liking Gaga and Bieber is sort of a "cool" thing in many social situations.

2. Our fav makes it so hard
I understand that the outlandish fashions are Gaga's style and Justin whole "hip black boy act" is him supposedly "maturing" as his fans would say, but these things make us fans have to put up with a lot of ********. It is so conflicting as a stan to say Gaga is a down to earth, typical New York girl, as she has proved many times, then she turns around and wears a damn dress made of completely meat. Justin Bieber suddenly is saying swag and sagging when 3 years ago is was sounding like a preteen girl saying "Baby, Baby, Baby"....(no shade, just the truth)

3.The rise to power
Gaga and Justin have in no time, both rose to a level of stardom other stars wish they had again, never will get to, or have hoped to get to for so long. The awards, the followers, the fans. It really bothers people. I will honestly admit, I felt the same way about Katy Perry last year. I really didn't like her and constantly dragged her, but she shut my ass up every time she dropped another hit and remained unbothered

4.Twitter
Twitter puts you up close with everyone's opinion. and what is seen cannot be unseen, and this causes alot of mess between fans and even celebrity vs celebrity fights

5. The comparisons to legends who took decades to get where they are

6. The delusional asshole fans.
No reason needed



MODS, WHAT IN THE WORLD!!!!! I STAN FOR GAGA, HOW AM I TROLLING????? EVERYONE KNOWS I AM A GAGA STAN, I DIDN'T MEAN THIS IN ANY HARMFUL WAY!

Can someone please explain this to me?

[Vin]

What about the grey area of commenting on a "fight" in NHB? For instance, if I want to say,
"I want Foxay and b3dro to get along." Can that comment be made in NHB even though
I'm not "fighting" but commenting on an argument, or is that more of an HQ statement?

...Vin

[Eric.]

Originally posted by Lee!!

For me it falls under the same heading as pointless. It's the same thing as a gif. Its not hard to use words.

I suppose that if I briefly agree with the statement of the post (warned or not) and add a smiley, it doesn't count as pointless. Right?

For example:

I know right.

-

And WIG-SNATCHER's thread was a very good and legitimate one.