That one really isn't hard... According to evolution, a chicken must have evolved from something. So the first creature that we would call a 'chicken' now, evolved from another egg-laying creature. So, the egg was first, laid by the creature which is only just not a chicken, but which hatched a chicken
Wherever the boundary of what is a chicken and what isn't is, I don't know, but that doesn't matter, it works for wherever the boundary is.
That one really isn't hard... According to evolution, a chicken must have evolved from something. So the first creature that we would call a 'chicken' now, evolved from another egg-laying creature. So, the egg was first, laid by the creature which is only just not a chicken, but which hatched a chicken
Wherever the boundary of what is a chicken and what isn't is, I don't know, but that doesn't matter, it works for wherever the boundary is.
Did you guys care about this?
who says there weren't chicken before (or animals that evolved into chicken) that were mammals and didn't lay eggs, but laying eggs turned out to be a better solution (aka bring less selection pressure)?
who says there weren't chicken before (or animals that evolved into chicken) that were mammals and didn't lay eggs, but laying eggs turned out to be a better solution (aka bring less selection pressure)?
Those weren't chicken. Chicken lay eggs, therefore any creature that doesn't lay eggs, is no chicken
That one really isn't hard... According to evolution, a chicken must have evolved from something. So the first creature that we would call a 'chicken' now, evolved from another egg-laying creature. So, the egg was first, laid by the creature which is only just not a chicken, but which hatched a chicken
Wherever the boundary of what is a chicken and what isn't is, I don't know, but that doesn't matter, it works for wherever the boundary is.
Did you guys care about this?
Not necessarily because the first ever creatures evolved on earth due to some chemical reactions in nature. Then evolution took place