[Shapes]

Originally posted by heavymetal0verr

The producer of the song, says otherwise. He, along with the songs co-writers, Gaga and Jeppe Laursen, were obviously notified, and know she Madonna has to pay to perform their song.

>trusting Fernando Garibay

ISHYGDDT

[Dickard]

Originally posted by Яeo.

Madonna knows how to make press. That's why she's the Queen of Pop.

If she were comfortable with her queenly title, she wouldn't resort to shading someone who has been on the scene a fraction of time she has.

Is she frightened that Gaga is coming for her weave? Maybe not this year, or in the next couple of years....but eventually.

[Icing]

Originally posted by Shapes

That Forbes article just says "she'd have to pay for Born this Way. That's not happening".

And we all know Madonna wouldn't bite the bullet and pay to use that song.

So she found a way to use it for free

That's the thing. Madonna would not sing this song if it meant paying a cent to Gaga. She will find a way around it. And that's a fact.

[Sammi]

Ahhhhhhhhhh

[JoaoP]

She's always shading. Boring.

[Dickard]

Originally posted by Shapes

>trusting Fernando Garibay

ISHYGDDT

She HAS to pay. It's the LAW.

[zombaland]

Originally posted by MrDeeds

Gaga fans actually look like this:

Deeds! Noooooo.

[Andre]

Originally posted by zombaland

Like it makes a difference. I just posted pictures that proves it IS about you guys and Gaga.
I don't wanna know exactly what pictures to use. Funny you say i know nothing yet you removed two of the pictures from my posts. OOP.

Not that ponytail is just a ponytail. Madonna did not invent ponytails.

Gaga was accused for "stealing" madonna's look because of the whole outfit @ grammys. Not just a ponytail.

[Entalan]

Originally posted by GreasyBruce

I can't at all the little monster meltdowns in this thread.

This is childish but I am here for it tbh, I love a good pop cold war. I wonder how Gaga will respond.

I'm interested in seeing that as well, given the theme of her next album. It has potential.

That said, I wouldn't advise anyone to get their hopes up, since Gaga will probably not respond at all.

Edit: Oh, and Shapes, you clocked me on the irony thing. I feel like an idiot.

[Swag]

Originally posted by GreasyBruce

I can't at all the little monster meltdowns in this thread.

This is childish but I am here for it tbh, I love a good pop cold war. I wonder how Gaga will respond.

Especially when it's played intelligently.

I have to say I was surprised when I saw the picture in the OP and read the description.

It does make sense, and it's genius, but I think it is critique of the blind consumption of pop culture in general.

[Mr. Fahrenheit]

Originally posted by Dickard

How....reductive

How do you still not know what this word means?

Anyway, I think it's clever and funny. If Monsters don't have a sense of humour, it's their problem. This thread has them seething. Deal with it, children.

[seismicity]

Originally posted by heavymetal0verr

The producer of the song, says otherwise. He, along with the songs co-writers, Gaga and Jeppe Laursen, were obviously notified, and know she Madonna has to pay to perform their song.

Just wondering, I thought if artists covered songs in concerts, they didn't have to pay?

[Clump]

Originally posted by GreasyBruce

I can't at all the little monster meltdowns in this thread.

This is childish but I am here for it tbh, I love a good pop cold war. I wonder how Gaga will respond.

Who is having a meltdown?

[Cupid]

There's like 6 pages of people arguing about Gaga will be getting paid for Madonna covering BTW...

Who really cares though? Madonna could easily **** out thousands of dollars it wouldn't even matter to her bank balance... It's not like Gaga getting money from the shade is making it any better... Y'all do the most.

The picture is funny but she's coming off as bitter, so no one is winning in this situation.

[GreasyBruce]

Originally posted by Remixed

She won't, just like she never does

She responded to the intial comparisons and had a meltdown on NME where she used "retarded". It brought the kiis, I wonder what will happen this time.

[QueenBLadyG]

[iStanGaga]

Originally posted by Lover

no.

she simply wants to educate.

Educate what? That a new pop star has taken from the past and made it her own and fans are eating it up? Isn't that the exact same thing she has done for 30 years? That's the pot calling the kettle black. Knowing her she's only doing this not out of complete spite but to grab media attention from the current popular artist just like she's done in the past i.e. Senead O'Connor. She cares less about educating and more about having the spotlight.

[Shapes]

Originally posted by Icing

That's the thing. Madonna would not sing this song if it meant paying a cent to Gaga. She will find a way around it. And that's a fact.

Exactly.

That Forbes article was written before the fact, and obviously Gaga's producer would say anything to save face

[Dickard]

Originally posted by Icing

That's the thing. Madonna would not sing this song if it meant paying a cent to Gaga. She will find a way around it. And that's a fact.

Obviously you don't understand copyright infringement laws.

[Maneater]

Madonna, I like you. But GUUURL you need to stop it.